首页> 外文会议>GMDS 2018, Annual Meeting >Measuring the Availability of Electronic Patient Data Across the Hospital and Throughout Selected Clinical Workflows
【24h】

Measuring the Availability of Electronic Patient Data Across the Hospital and Throughout Selected Clinical Workflows

机译:测量整个医院和整个选定的临床工作流程的电子患者数据的可用性

获取原文

摘要

The workflow-oriented dissemination of electronic patient data is a central goal of IT deployment in hospitals. Against this background, the present study examines two research questions: (1.) Are there differences in the availability of electronic patient data (AEPD) between different clinical workflows and data types and (2.) which structural and organizational factors determine AEPD? Based on a Germany wide hospital survey, AEPD was assessed along six clinical workflows. While AEPD was lowest for ward rounds, discharge showed the highest AEPD with pre- and post-surgery processes ranging in between. With regard to the data types analyzed, patient demographics and observation findings obtained the highest AEPD scores. Electrophysiological results, checklists and warnings were less common electronically and received lower AEPD scores. Multiple linear regression analysis resulted in a significant model that explained 34.4% of the variance of AEPD. Large hospitals and those with a professional information management, a high health IT related innovation culture and a nursing informatics officer possess higher AEPD scores and thus have better clinical information logistics mechanisms at their command.
机译:以工作流向的电子患者数据传播是它在医院部署的核心目标。在此背景下,本研究审查了两项研究问题:(1.)在不同临床工作流程和数据类型之间的电子患者数据(AEPD)的可用性有所不同,以及(2)哪些结构和组织因素确定艾普?基于德国宽阔的医院调查,艾普在六个临床工作流程中评估。虽然AEPD为病房回合最低,但放电显示了最高的炎症,并且手术后的过程之间的介于两者之间。关于分析的数据类型,患者人口统计数据和观察结果获得了最高的AEPD分数。电生理结果,清单和警告不太普遍,并获得较低的AEPD分数。多元线性回归分析导致了显着的模型,解释了艾普德差异的34.4%。大型医院和具有专业信息管理的人,一个高卫生IT相关的创新文化和护理信息官具有更高的AEPD分数,从而具有更好的临床信息物流机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号