首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society international annual meeting >How Accurately Can an Observer Assess Participant Self- Reported Workload?
【24h】

How Accurately Can an Observer Assess Participant Self- Reported Workload?

机译:观察者如何准确地评估参与者自我报告的工作量?

获取原文

摘要

Subjective workload assessments are used often in human factors, almost always from the perspective of the one performing the task. How well would an observer or experimenter be able to subjectively rate the mental workload of a task being performed by a subject? In this experiment, participants formed groups of two in which one acted as an experimenter and the other as a subject. The experimenter administered three types of distractor tasks to the subject while the subject held a consonant triad in their working memory. The three tasks were a high difficulty task (counting), a medium difficulty task (writing), and a low difficulty task (drawing). Both experimenter and subject then filled out a NASA-TLX for all three task types. Roles were switched and the process repeated. Significant differences in rating were found for the high difficulty but not the low difficulty task, with the medium difficulty task in between.
机译:主观工作量评估通常在人类因素中使用,几乎总是从执行任务的角度来看。观察者或实验者能够主观地利用受试者执行的任务的心理工作量如何?在该实验中,参与者形成了两组,其中一个人作为实验者,另一种是受试者。实验者向主题管理三种分类任务任务,而主题在其工作记忆中持有辅音三合会。三个任务是一个高难度任务(计数),中等难度任务(写入)和低难度任务(绘图)。两种实验者和主题都填写了所有三种任务类型的NASA-TLX。切换角色并重复过程。对于高难度而不是低难度任务,发现了评级的显着差异,中等难度任务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号