首页> 外文会议>Molecular Medicine TRI-CON. >Comparative Evaluation of the FDA Approved THxIDTM BRAF Test in a Hospital-Based Molecular Laboratory
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of the FDA Approved THxIDTM BRAF Test in a Hospital-Based Molecular Laboratory

机译:FDA批准的Thxidtm BRAF测试在医院分子实验室的比较评价

获取原文

摘要

Background: Since patients diagnosed with BRAF V600E and V600K mutated advanced melanoma show response to treatment with MAP kinase inhibitors, several sensitive methods have been developed to determine the V600 allele status of melanoma patients. The new FDA-approved THxID? BRAF companion diagnostic test was compared to two other testing methods designed and used for routine diagnostic testing in the Montpellier CHU hospital. Patients and methods: A series of 82 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens of malignant melanoma were analyzed. DNA was extracted from whole 5 urn tissue sections (n=18) and punches (n=64). Samples were tested for BRAF V600 mutations using the THxID? BRAF test, High Resolution Melting (HRM), and bidirectional Sanger sequencing, on 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR (Applied Biosystems), cobas? 4800 System (Roche Molecular Diagnostics), and ABI PRISM? 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems), respectively. Positive (PPA) and negative (NPA) percent agreements were determined between the THxID? BRAF test and the other assays. Results: Invalid results were observed in 1/82 specimens (1.2%) with Sanger (not included in percent agreement calculations), 0/82 with HRM, and 1/82 (1.2%) with the THxID? BRAF test. PPA was 35/36 (97.2%) for V600E and V600K mutations combined for the THxID? BRAF test and HRM, and NPA was 44/46 (95.7%). For the THxID? BRAF test and Sanger, PPA was 36/37 (97.3%) and NPA 44/44 (100%). One V600E sample identified by THxID? BRAF test was detected as wild-type by HRM and uninterpretable by Sanger. Interestingly, all V600K (n=3) were detected using the 3 different approaches. Percent agreement values were not lower when using punches (n=64) versus slides (n=18) suggesting this new format is suitable for the THxID? BRAF assay. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the high agreement between the FDA approved THxID? BRAF assay and two technically different testing methods: Sanger sequencing and HRM. It has also highlighted the potential of THxID? BRAF to be applied to a broader range of sample types than claimed in the current "instructions for use", an extension that would require the ad hoc validation and approval.
机译:背景技术由于诊断患有BRAF V600E和V600K突变的晚期黑色素瘤的患者表现出对用MAP激酶抑制剂治疗的反应,因此已经开发了几种敏感方法来确定黑素瘤患者的V600等位基因状态。新的FDA批准的ThxID?将BRAF伴侣诊断测试与蒙彼利埃楚院常规诊断检测进行了比较。患者和方法:分析了一系列82福尔胺固定的石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织标本的恶性黑素瘤。从整个5瓮组织切片(n = 18)和冲头(n = 64)中提取DNA。使用ThxID测试BRAF V600突变的样品? BRAF测试,高分辨率熔化(HRM),双向桑格测序,在7500快速DX实时PCR(应用生物系统),COBAS? 4800系统(Roche分子诊断)和Abi Prism? 3100遗传分析仪(应用生物系统)分别。在ThxID之间确定阳性(PPA)和负(NPA)百分比协议? BRAF测试和其他测定。结果:在1/82标本(1.2%)中观察到无效的结果(1.2%),桑格(不包括在百分比百分比计算),0/82,HRM,1/82(1.2%),ThxID? BRAF测试。 PPA为V600E和V600K突变为ThxID组合的35/36(97.2%)? BRAF测试和HRM,NPA为44/46(95.7%)。对于thxid? BRAF测试和Sanger,PPA为36/37(97.3%)和NPA 44/44(100%)。 Thxid标识的一个V600E样本? BRAF测试被HRM检测为野生型,并通过Sanger无法解释。有趣的是,使用3种不同的方法检测所有V600K(n = 3)。当使用拳击(n = 64)与幻灯片(n = 18)表示这种新格式适用于Thxid时,协议值百分比不会降低? BRAF测定。结论:本研究展示了FDA批准THXID之间的高协议? BRAF测定和两种技术上不同的测试方法:Sanger测序和HRM。它也强调了Thxid的潜力? BRAF应用于更广泛的样本类型,比声称在当前的“使用说明”中,一个需要临时验证和批准的扩展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号