首页> 外文会议>SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Security, Environment, and Social Responsibility >ERA Acute-Implementation of a New Method for Environmental Risk Assessment of Acute Offshore Oil Spills
【24h】

ERA Acute-Implementation of a New Method for Environmental Risk Assessment of Acute Offshore Oil Spills

机译:时代急性实施急性海上溢油溢出的环境风险评估方法

获取原文

摘要

Energy companies, like Statoil and TOTAL conduct Environmental Risk assessments (ERAs) as part of their risk management processes to ensure acceptable environmental risk for all operations. In some parts of the world, ERAs are required by regulators to assess risk and as a basis for evaluating risk reducing measures. A standardized ERA Acute method has been developed, providing quantitative assessment of environmental impact and risk of acute oil spills covering four environmental compartments: sea surface, shoreline, water column and seafloor. The method usesoil drift simulations and Valued Ecosystem Components (VECs) data as input. Based on a selection of relevant oil spill incidents, impact and recovery timesare calculated for VECs in all compartmentsusingcontinuous functions. Several endpoints are provided including the "Resource Damage Factor" (RDF) combining the extent of an impact with recovery time, the risk matrix, and a risk comparison tool, e.g. for quantifying effects of risk reducing measures. The methodology has been benchmarked and compared to the current industry standard ERA used on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS), the MIRA method (NOROG, 2007). The ERA Acute method has also been compared with data from the real spill incidents: Deepwater Horizon (Gulf of Mexico, 2010) and Exxon Valdez (Alaska, 1989). Estimated impact and recovery time of incidents, e.g. from post-spill monitoring of environmental impact and reconstructed oil exposure data from satellite have been compared to ERA acute calculations and oil spill simulations. Acknowledging that validation of the model is challenging, the results support the new impact algorithms, and are within the range of expected uncertainties related to field observations. The continuous risk functions better discriminate the effect of small spills and of mitigation measures compared toMIRA methodology, and details of the exposure mechanisms such as exposure time and specific behavior of surface species are also included. The validity and applicability of the new ERA Acute methodology are presented in the paper, including the benefits the industry obtains from a standardized methodology providing reliable environmental risk estimations.
机译:能源公司,如国家机关和全面行为环境风险评估(ERAS)作为其风险管理流程的一部分,以确保所有业务的可接受的环境风险。在世界某些地区,监管机构要求时代评估风险,并作为评估风险降低措施的基础。已经开发了一种标准化的时代急性方法,为覆盖四个环境舱的环境影响和急性油溢出的风险提供了定量评估:海面,海岸线,水柱和海底。该方法使用漂移模拟和有价值的生态系统组件(VECS)数据作为输入。基于各种Continuol函数中的VEC计算的相关漏油事件,影响和恢复时间。提供了几个端点,包括“资源损伤因子”(RDF),将影响的影响与恢复时间,风险矩阵和风险比较工具相结合,例如,用于量化风险降低措施的影响。该方法已经基准,与挪威大陆架(NCS),Mira方法(Norog,2007)的当前行业标准时代进行了基准测试。还将时代急性方法与来自真正溢出事件的数据进行了比较:深水地平线(墨西哥湾,2010年)和埃克森·瓦尔德斯(阿拉斯加,1989年)。事件的估计影响和恢复时间,例如从泄漏后监测环境影响和重建的卫星的石油暴露数据已经与ERA急性计算和漏油模拟进行了比较。承认该模型的验证是具有挑战性的,结果支持新的影响算法,并且在与现场观察相关的预期不确定性范围内。连续风险功能更好地区分小溢出和减缓措施的影响,而是与Tomira方法进行了比较,以及曝光机制的细节,如暴露时间和表面物种的特定行为。本文提出了新的时代急性方法的有效性和适用性,包括业界从提供可靠的环境风险估算的标准方法获得的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号