...
首页> 外文期刊>Marine pollution bulletin >Comparative risk assessment of oil spill response options for a deepwater oil well blowout: Part Ⅱ. Relative risk methodology
【24h】

Comparative risk assessment of oil spill response options for a deepwater oil well blowout: Part Ⅱ. Relative risk methodology

机译:深水油井井喷溢油应急方案比较风险评估:第二部分。相对风险方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Subsea dispersant injection (SSDI) was a new oil spill response (OSR) technology deployed during the Deepwater Horizon accident. To integrate SSDI into future OSR decisions, a hypothetical deepwater oil spill to the Gulf of Mexico was simulated and a comparative risk assessment (CRA) tool applied to contrast three response strategies: (1) no intervention; (2) mechanical recovery, in-situ burning, and surface dispersants; and, (3) SSDI in addition to responses in (2). A comparative ecological risk assessment (CRA) was applied to multiple valued ecosystem components (VECs) inhabiting different environmental compartments (ECs) using EC-specific exposure and relative VEC population density and recovery time indices. Results demonstrated the added benefit of SSDI since relative risks to shoreline, surface wildlife and most aquatic life VECs were reduced. Sensitivity of results to different assumptions was also tested to illustrate flexibility of the CRA tool in addressing different stakeholder priorities for mitigating the impacts of a deepwater blowout.
机译:水下分散剂注入(SSDI)是在Deepwater Horizo​​n事故期间部署的一种新的溢油应急(OSR)技术。为了将SSDI纳入未来的OSR决策中,模拟了一个假设的向墨西哥湾的深水漏油事件,并使用了比较风险评估(CRA)工具来对比三种应对策略:(1)无干预; (2)机械回收,原位燃烧和表面分散剂; (3)除了(2)中的响应之外,还有SSDI。使用特定于EC的暴露以及相对VEC人口密度和恢复时间指数,对居住在不同环境区室(EC)的多个有价值的生态系统组件(VEC)进行了比较生态风险评估(CRA)。结果表明,由于减少了对海岸线,地表野生生物和大多数水生生物VEC的相对风险,SSDI的附加优势。还测试了结果对不同假设的敏感性,以说明CRA工具在解决不同利益相关者优先级以减轻深水井喷影响时​​的灵活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号