首页> 外文会议>International Conference for Science Educators and Teachers >The Implementation of Assessment Character Education Results in Secondary School
【24h】

The Implementation of Assessment Character Education Results in Secondary School

机译:中学评估性质教育的实施

获取原文

摘要

Integrated character education in secondary school (SMP) has been planned and conducted since 2010, but the result is not yet optimal and there is a lot of obstacle in conducting the plan. The weak monitoring from the government toward this integrated character education, not all guidance and counseling teacher have time to enter class to give the appropriate character guidance, class teacher that forced to be a character educator in between class time, and the lack of character education process and result assessment/evaluation system are factors that support the unsuccessful implementation of integrated character education in school. The character education problem that occur in SMP need to be assessed in order to found the alternative solution, and also need to develop an effective and operational evaluation model for character education process and result so it become easy to implement in school. Yet, the government haven't developed a standardize assessment, measurement, and evaluation system for character education to evaluate the integration character education process and result in SMP. Common way is used by teacher to assess students' character education in school and it still focused on using the technique of observation, behavior scale, and point system. That method has a lot of disadvantages such as subjective, sporadic, perceptional, inconsistent, less systematic and draw many arguments. How does the character education process and result in SMP assessed and what is the obstacle? This article is intended to discuss those based on the findings of evaluative research at 11 SMPs from some city in Indonesia. The data was collected through closed-opened questioner from 51 principals and teachers during June 2017. The data was analyzed in simple way; descriptive explorative using percentage technique and the result presented in graphical perspective.
机译:自2010年以来已经计划和进行中学(SMP)中的综合性质教育,但结果尚未最佳,并在开展计划方面存在很多障碍。从政府对这种综合性质教育的弱势监测,并非所有指导和咨询教师都有时间进入课堂,给予适当的性格指导,班级教师被迫成为课堂间的角色教育者,以及缺乏性格教育过程和结果评估/评估系统是支持学校综合性状教育的不成功实施的因素。需要评估SMP中出现的性格教育问题,以便找到替代解决方案,并且还需要为性格教育过程和结果开发有效和运营的评估模型,因此在学校易于实施。然而,政府尚未制定标准化评估,计量和评估系统,以评估整合性格教育过程并导致SMP。教师使用常见的方式来评估学生的学生的性质教育,它仍然专注于使用观察,行为规模和点系统的技术。该方法具有许多缺点,例如主观,零星,感知,不一致,不太系统的,并吸引许多争论。性格教育过程和结果如何评估SMP,障碍是什么?本文旨在根据印度尼西亚一些城市的11个SMPS评估研究结果讨论其中。这些数据通过于2017年6月的51名校长和教师从51名校长和教师收集。数据以简单的方式分析;描述性探索使用百分比技术和图形视角呈现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号