首页> 外文会议>SAE World Congress Experience >Real World Accident Analysis of Driver Car-to-Car Intersection Near-Side Impacts: Focus on Impact Location, Impact Angle and Lateral Delta-V
【24h】

Real World Accident Analysis of Driver Car-to-Car Intersection Near-Side Impacts: Focus on Impact Location, Impact Angle and Lateral Delta-V

机译:现场世界意外分析司机车辆交叉路口近侧影响:专注于冲击位置,冲击角和横向Δ-v

获取原文

摘要

In total, 865 intersection car-to-car crashes (NASS-CDS CY 2004-2014) are analyzed in detail to determine the injury level outcome based on different crash factors, such as delta-V, age, airbag deployment, number of events, impact locations (F,Y,P,Z,D,B-regions based on CDC codes), amount of compartment intrusion and impact angle. A multivariate logistic regression test was performed to predict the probability of MAIS3+ serious injuries using lateral delta-V, location of maximum deformation from B-PLR, age (0: <60/1: ≥60 years), number of events (0: single/ 1: multiple), intrusion (0: <16cm/ 1: ≥16cm), side airbag deployment (yes/no) and direction of impact (0: 9/ 1: 10 o’clock). It is found that direction of impact is one of the significant (p<0.05) parameters and 10 o’clock angle impact has more influence than 9 o’clock perpendicular lateral impact. Frequency of AIS3+ injuries was high in Y-region impact cases. A sensitivity analysis of serious injuries is performed with respect to lateral delta-V based on logistic regression equation. The probability of serious injury increases more than 2 times when the angle of impact changes from 9 to 10 o’clock. However, the increase in probability of serious injury when the lateral delta-V changes from 25 to 30kph (equivalent to 50 to 60kph impact velocity of struck vehicle) is less than that of the change due to angle of impact. The above physical phenomena in real world accident were also verified with barrier to car FE simulations. After the introduction of IIHS and SINCAP crash performance tests, newer vehicles are becoming safer from occupant protection point view. However, this study reveals that there may be room for further improvement to reduce serious injuries of occupants in C2C side impact crashes at intersection. Further enhancement of occupant safety performance may be achieved by (a) proper selection of passive safety parameters (such as, impact angle, delta-V and location of impact, velocity of struck vehicle) or (b) a combination of passive and active safety technologies (such as AEB at intersection) in future crash tests configurations.
机译:总共865相交车对车崩溃(NASS-CDS CY 2004年至2014年)进行了分析,详细来基于不同的碰撞因素,如Δ-V,年龄,气囊展开,事件的数目的损伤水平的结果,撞击位置(F,Y,P,Z,d,基于CDC代码B区域),隔室侵入和冲击角的量。进行多变量logistic回归测试来预测使用横向Δ-V,最大变形的位置从B-PLR,年龄MAIS3 +严重受伤的可能性(0:<60/1:≥60岁),0事件数(:单/ 1:多个),入侵(0:<16厘米/ 1:≥16cm),侧面安全气囊展开(是/否)和影响(0的方向:9/1:10时)。据发现,冲击的方向是显著(P <0.05)的参数中的一个和十点角冲击具有比垂直的横向冲击9时更大的影响力。 AIS3 +伤害的频率是Y型区域影响的案件高。严重受伤的敏感性分析相对于基于Logistic回归方程横向Δ-V执行。的严重伤害增加时冲击的角度改变从9至10时的2倍以上的概率。然而,在严重伤害的可能性增加时从25横向增量-V变化30kph(相当于50至击打车辆的60kph冲击速度)小于该变化的由于冲击角度。在现实世界中事故以上的物理现象也与屏障汽车有限元模拟验证。引进IIHS和SINCAP碰撞性能测试后,新的汽车将成为由乘员保护角度出发更安全。然而,这项研究表明,可能有进一步改进的余地,以减少C2C侧面碰撞事故乘员的严重伤害的交集。的乘员的安全性能进一步增强可以通过(a)的被动安全参数(如,冲击角,δ-V和冲击的位置,撞击车辆的速度)或(b)被动和主动安全的组合适当选择来实现技术(如在交叉AEB)在未来的碰撞测试配置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号