首页> 外文会议>SAE World Congress Experience >Experimental Comparison between Stratified Flame Ignition and Micro Flame Ignition in a Gasoline SI-CAI Hybrid Combustion Engine
【24h】

Experimental Comparison between Stratified Flame Ignition and Micro Flame Ignition in a Gasoline SI-CAI Hybrid Combustion Engine

机译:汽油Si-CAI杂交燃烧发动机分层火焰点火和微火焰点火的实验比较

获取原文

摘要

Controlled Auto-Ignition (CAI), also known as Homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI), has been the subject of extensive research because of their ability to providing simultaneous reduction in fuel consumption and NO_x emissions in a gasoline engine. However, due to its limited operation range, combustion mode switching between CAI and spark ignition (SI) combustion is essential to cover the overall operational range of a gasoline engine for passenger car applications. Previous research has shown that the SI-CAI hybrid combustion has the potential to control the ignition timing and heat release process during both steady state and transient operations. However, it was found that the SI-CAI hybrid combustion process is often characterized with large cycle-to-cycle variations, due to the flame instability at high dilution conditions. In order to control the heat release process stably and expand the operating range of SI-CAI hybrid combustion, based on the idea that increased flame speed would improve the combustion stability at diluted conditions, the stratified flame ignition (SFI) and micro flame ignition strategy (MFI) involved in the SI-CAI hybrid operation were analyzed respectively based on the engine experiments carried out on a single cylinder research engine equipped with both intake and exhaust mechanical variable valve actuation systems. The distribution of fuel concentration and activity were named as SFI and MFI respectively due to their characteristics. The premixed homogenous dilution charge as main fuel was injected by intake port injector. Meanwhile, the stratified gasoline fuel (in SFI) or DME (in MFI) injected by direct injector in the cylinder was used as an enhanced flame kernel. The results show that both SFI and MFI strategy are useful to expand the dilution combustion range and adjust the combustion phase of SI-CAI hybrid combustion. But SFI strategy faced the high cyclic variation of heat release process in continuous cycles, while the key problem of MFI is knock and the worse caused by fast heat release. Both of these two strategies require optimization to be feasible to combustion control at different conditions.
机译:受控自动点火(CAI),也称为均匀电荷压缩点火(HCCI),这是广泛研究的主题,因为它们能够在汽油发动机中提供燃料消耗和NO_X排放的能力。然而,由于其操作范围有限,CAI和火花点火(Si)燃烧之间的燃烧模式切换对于乘用车应用的汽油发动机的总体运行范围是必不可少的。以前的研究表明,Si-CAI混合燃烧具有控制在稳态和瞬态操作期间的点火正时和热释放过程。然而,发现Si-Cai杂化燃烧过程通常具有大的循环到循环变化,这是由于高稀释条件下的火焰不稳定性。为了稳定地控制热释放过程并扩大Si-CAI杂交燃烧的操作范围,基于增加的火焰速度提高稀释条件下的燃烧稳定性,分层火焰点火(SFI)和微火焰点火策略(MFI)分别基于在配备有进气和排气机械可变阀致动系统的单缸研究发动机上进行的发动机实验进行分析了SI-CAI混合动力操作。由于其特征,分别将燃料浓度和活性的分布命名为SFI和MFI。通过进气口注射器注入预混合的均匀稀释电荷作为主燃料。同时,通过直接喷射器中喷射在气缸中的分层汽油燃料(在SFI中)或DME(在MFI中)用作增强的火焰核。结果表明,SFI和MFI策略均可扩大稀释燃烧范围,调整Si-Cai杂交燃烧的燃烧相。但SFI策略面临着连续循环中的热释放过程的高循环变化,而MFI的关键问题是敲击,并且通过快速释放引起的更糟。这两种策略都需要优化在不同条件下燃烧控制可行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号