首页> 外文会议>Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium >A Hyperbolic Cosine Unfolding Model for Evaluating Rater Accuracy in Writing Assessments
【24h】

A Hyperbolic Cosine Unfolding Model for Evaluating Rater Accuracy in Writing Assessments

机译:评估评估评估准确性的双曲余弦展开模型

获取原文

摘要

Murphy and Cleveland (1995) defined rating accuracy as one type of rating quality index, which has been used to evaluate rating quality, rater performance, and even training efficiency. Engelhard (2013) indicated that "accuracy can be defined as the comparison between unknown processes and a defined standard process in order to adjust the unknown process until it matches the standard" (p. 232). In other words, accuracy measures the distance between the operational ratings and the criterion ratings. There are many ways to obtain the criterion ratings. Engelhard (1996) used the criterion ratings defined by a panel of experts. Wolfe and McVay (2012) have defined the true ratings based on average ratings across the operational raters. Rater accuracy within the context of writing assessment can be defined as a latent trait indicating how accurate a rater is in scoring the essays (Engelhard 2013). Other ways to calculate accuracy ratings have been proposed (Cronbach 1955; Sulsky and Balzer 1988; Jones 2007).
机译:Murphy和Cleveland(1995)定义了评级精度作为一种评级质量指标,已被用于评估评级质量,速度表现,甚至培训效率。 Engelhard(2013)表示,“准确性可以定义为未知过程与定义的标准过程之间的比较,以便在与标准匹配之前调整未知过程”(第232页)。换句话说,精度测量操作额定值和标准额定值之间的距离。有很多方法可以获得标准评级。 Engelhard(1996)使用专家小组定义的标准额定值。 Wolfe和McVay(2012)已根据业务评估者的平均评级确定了真实评级。写作评估背景下的评估准确性可以被定义为潜在的特征,表明评估者在散文中评分的准确程度(Engelhard 2013)。已经提出了计算精度评级的其他方法(Cronbach 1955; Sulsky和Balzer 1988; Jones 2007)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号