首页> 外文会议>Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition Conference >A Reliability Based Approach to Assess Pressure Relieving Device Testing Frequency
【24h】

A Reliability Based Approach to Assess Pressure Relieving Device Testing Frequency

机译:基于可靠性的评估压力缓解装置测试频率的方法

获取原文

摘要

Pressure Reliving Devices (PRD) forms the last line of defenses in a Process Safety system. Their performance is often tested only during the scheduled testing opportunities. A review process of validating the adequacy of the testing frequency is deemed to be of paramount importance from a Process Safety and Integrity perspective. A set of 351 PRD test data from crude unit of three refineries were studied to develop a reliability based model using three different approaches. Risk based approach using API 581, Normal Exponential Reliability equations and 2 Parameter Weibull Analysis (using industry standard software) were used to calculate the reliabilities of the set of sample PRDs with different testing frequencies and benchmarked against the desired level of reliability. The testing data of 351 PRD test data were analyased through the three techniques and reliability values calculated. The sample refineries used frequencies of 2, 4 & 5 years and 99% desired reliability. With the sample failure data, the plant using 4 years frequency was be closest to the desired level of Reliability. 2 years frequency was found to be too conservative (over Inspection) while the plant with 5 year frequency showed less then desired level of PRD reliability, thereby compromising Process Safety. The assessment demonstrated usefulness of normal Exponential equation based calculations, which is reasonably consistent with the complex calculations done through the API 581 or the Weibull Software generated reliability values. It was evident that the Normal Exponential Equation with simple failure rate as the only critical input, was adequately robust to carryout preliminary assessment of adequacy of the PRD testing frequencies. The size and homogeneity of the database is critical in increasing the accuracy of the assessments. This approach would assist scientific validation of PRD testing frequencies. Potential for a software based platform for PDR reliability assessment also is an opportunity.
机译:压力重温设备(PRD)形成防御的过程安全系统的最后一道防线。他们的表现只有在计划测试的机会往往是测试。验证测试频率的充分的审查过程被认为是从一个过程安全性和完整性的角度非常重要。一组从三个炼油厂原油蒸馏装置351个PRD测试数据进行了研究开发使用三种不同的方法可靠性基于模型。使用API​​ 581基于风险的方法,正常指数可靠性方程和2组参数威布尔分析(使用行业标准软件)用来计算该组具有不同的测试频率样本泄压装置的可靠性和基准对的可靠性所需的水平。 351个PRD测试数据的测试数据通过三种技术和计算的可靠性值analyased。样品炼油厂使用的2,45年频率和99%的期望的可靠性。与样品失效数据,使用4年频率的植物是最接近可靠性所需的水平。 2年频率被发现是过于保守(超过检验),而用5年频率的植物显示出PRD可靠性小于期望的水平,从而损害过程安全。正常指数公式计算基础的评估证明有用,这与通过API 581或威布尔软件生成的可靠性值进行复杂的计算相当一致。很明显,正常指数方程简单的故障率作为唯一重要的投入,是足够坚固开展做实珠三角测试频率充足的初步评估。该数据库的大小和均匀性是提高评估的准确性至关重要。这种方法将有助于珠三角测试频率的科学验证。潜力为PDR可靠性评估基于软件的平台,也是一个机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号