首页> 外文会议>SPE EP Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental Conference >Barrier Verification: A Pillar of Industry Well Control
【24h】

Barrier Verification: A Pillar of Industry Well Control

机译:障碍验证:行业良好控制的支柱

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The oil and gas industry is well aware of the criticality of well control barriers; they are often what stand between us and catastrophe. Emphasis on barriers has become more prominent within the Oil and Gas industry, which has utilized several methods to keep the hydrocarbons where they belong. However, most provide little insight into methods of barrier verification, and the assurance of such methods. Building on the results of previous studies that emphasize the criticality of barriers in relation to well control by J.G. Go Boncan and G.E. King & D.E. King in publications titled “BowTie and Job Hazard Analysis: A Case Study to Communicate the Barrier Philosophy as it Relates to Process Safety in Well Operations” and “Environmental Risk Arising From Well-Construction Failure—Differences Between Barrier and Well Failure, and Estimates of Failure Frequency Across Common Well Types, Locations, and Well Age” respectively, this paper addresses the need for barrier verification assurance, which is seen as the next logical step in achieving the ultimate goal of well control. Well control barriers are critical, but how is the industry verifying them? And if so, how are they assured? More importantly, is there a way to measure barrier assurance? This paper explains an evaluation of several barrier verification methods, their strengths and limitations, taking into account various geographical, technological and resource considerations. The output of the evaluation is a Barrier Assurance Metric (BAM) which can be used to determine if there is an adequate level of barrier assurance at the well site.
机译:石油和天然气工业知晓良好控制障碍的关键性;他们往往是我们与灾难之间的代表。强调障碍物在石油和天然气行业内变得更加突出,利用了几种方法来保持它们所属的碳氢化合物。然而,大多数人提供了很少地了解障碍验证方法,以及这些方法的保证。建立先前研究的结果,以强调障碍与J.G的良好控制的关键性。去oncan和g.e. king&d.e.出版物的国王标题为“Bowtie和工作危险分析:一个案例研究,传达屏障哲学,因为它涉及到井运营的过程安全性”和“屏障良好的危机失败差异产生的环境风险,以及估计本文分别跨越普通井类型,位置和井年龄的失败频率“,”屏障验证保证的需要,这被视为实现良好控制终极目标的下一个逻辑步骤。良好的控制障碍是至关重要的,但行业核实如何验证它们?如果是这样,他们如何保证?更重要的是,有没有办法测量障碍保证?本文解释了几种屏障验证方法,其优势和局限性的评估,考虑到各种地理,技术和资源考虑。评估的输出是一个屏障保证度量(BAM),其可用于确定井位点是否存在足够的障碍保证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号