首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Alternative Energy in Developing Countries and Emerging Economies >Energy Efficiency Improvement in Community-Scale Whisky Factories of Thailand by Various Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods
【24h】

Energy Efficiency Improvement in Community-Scale Whisky Factories of Thailand by Various Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods

机译:各种多标准决策方法,泰国社区规模威士忌工厂的能源效率提高

获取原文

摘要

The main objective is to select an appropriate decision making tool to be used for ranking energy efficiency improvement measures in community-scale whisky factories in Thailand. There are six measures comprising (1) insulation for the evaporator, (2) heat recovery from waste water, (3) pre-heating for fermented liquor, (4) high efficiency evaporator, (5) high efficiency condenser, and (6) high efficiency stove & air-fuel ratio improvement. The measures are considered under five criteria, which are cost (capital and maintenance), payback period, competitiveness, labor and social impacts, and environmental concerns. In this study, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Value Engineering (VE) are the tools in consideration. The study finds that both AHP and ANP use a system of pairwise comparison for scoring each alternative under the criteria. AHP structures a decision problem into a hierarchy with a goal, criteria and alternatives, while the ANP structures it as a network. With AHP, each criterion and alternative is considered independently from another, but with ANP, interdependent decisions are given among criteria and alternatives. VE is different from the other two by considering function of each alternative versus cost and then comparing among all of them without interdependence and pairwise comparison. It is found that the ANP is a good tool but it is too complex for factory owners who are all villagers. VE is cost oriented which is inappropriate for considering intangible aspects. In conclusion, AHP is the most appropriate application in this case due to the fact that it can consider both tangible and intangible aspects, with less complex methodology for the factory owners.
机译:主要目标是选择适当的决策工具,用于排名泰国社区规模威士忌工厂的能效改进措施。有六种措施包括(1)用于蒸发器的绝缘,(2)从废水中加热回收,(3)发酵液预热,(4)高效蒸发器,(5)高效冷凝器,和(6)高效炉灶和空燃比改善。这些措施是在五个标准下审议,这是成本(资本和维护),投资期,竞争力,劳动力和社会影响以及环境问题。在本研究中,分析层次过程(AHP),分析网络过程(ANP)和价值工程(VE)是考虑的工具。该研究发现,AHP和ANP都使用了一个成对比较的系统来评分​​标准下的每个替代方案。 AHP将决策问题与目标,标准和替代方案的层次结构构成到层次结构中,而ANP将其作为网络结构。使用AHP,每个标准和替代方案都是独立于另一个的,但是通过ANP,标准和替代方案中的相互依存决策。通过考虑每个替代与成本的功能,然后在所有这些中与它们相比进行比较而没有相互依存和成对比较,VE与其他两个不同。结果发现,ANP是一个好工具,但对于所有村民们来说,这对于工厂所有者来说太复杂了。 ve是成本导向,不适合考虑无形方面。总之,AHP是在这种情况下最合适的应用,因为它可以考虑有形和无形的方面,具有较少复杂的工厂所有者的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号