首页> 外文学位 >Analyzing Residential End-Use Energy Consumption Data to Inform Residential Consumer Decisions and Enable Energy Efficiency Improvements.
【24h】

Analyzing Residential End-Use Energy Consumption Data to Inform Residential Consumer Decisions and Enable Energy Efficiency Improvements.

机译:分析住宅最终用途的能源消耗数据,以告知居民消费者的决定并促进能效的提高。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While renewable energy is in the process of maturing, energy efficiency improvements may provide an opportunity to reduce energy consumption and consequent greenhouse gas emissions to bridge the gap between current emissions and the reductions necessary to prevent serious effects of climate change and will continue to be an integral part of greenhouse gas emissions policy moving forward. Residential energy is a largely untapped source of energy reductions as consumers, who wish to reduce energy consumption for monetary, environmental, and other reasons, face barriers. One such barrier is a lack of knowledge or understanding of how energy is consumed in a home and how to reduce this consumption effectively through behavioral and technological changes.;One way to improve understanding of residential energy consumption is through the creation of a model to predict which appliances and electronics will be present and significantly contribute to the electricity consumption of a home on the basis of various characteristics of that home. The basis of this model is publically available survey data from the Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS). By predicting how households are likely to consume energy, homeowners, policy makers, and other stakeholders have access to valuable data that enables reductions in energy consumption in the residential sector. This model can be used to select homes that may be ripe for energy reductions and to predict the appliances that are the basis of these potential reductions. This work suggests that most homes in the U.S. have about eight appliances that are responsible for about 80% of the electricity consumption in that home. Characteristics such as census region, floor space, income, and total electricity consumption affect which appliances are likely to be in a home, however the number of appliances is generally around 8. Generally it takes around 4 appliances to reach the 50% threshold and 12 appliances to reach 90% of electricity consumption, which suggests significant diminishing returns for parties interested in monitoring appliance level electricity consumption.;Another way to improve understanding of residential energy consumption is through the development of residential use phase energy vectors for use in the Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIO-LCA) model. The EIO-LCA model is a valuable scoping tool to predict the environmental impacts of economic activity. This tool has a gap in its capabilities as residential use phase energy is outside the scope of the model. Adding use phase energy vectors to the EIO-LCA model will improve the modeling, provide a more complete estimation of energy impacts and allow for embedded energy to be compared to use phase energy for the purchase of goods and services in the residential sector. This work adds 21 quads of energy to the residential energy sector for the model and 15 quads of energy for personal transportation. These additions represent one third of the total energy consumption of the United States and a third of the total energy in the EIO-LCA model. This work also demonstrates that for many products such as electronics and household appliances use phase energy demands are much greater than manufacturing energy demands and dominate the life cycles for these products.;A final way in which this thesis improves upon the understanding of how use phase energy is consumed in a home is through the exploration of potential energy reductions in a home. This analysis selects products that are used or consumed in a home, and explores the potential for reductions in the embedded manufacturing and use phase energy of that product using EIO-LCA and the energy vectors created in Chapter 3. The results give consumers an understanding of where energy is consumed in the lifecycle of products that they purchase and provide policy makers with valuable information on how to focus or refocus policies that are aimed and reducing energy in the residential sector. This work finds that a majority of the energy consumed by retail products is consumed in the use phase of electronics and appliances. Consequently the largest potential reductions in residential energy use can be found in the same area. The work also shows that targeting reductions in the manufacturing energy for many products is likely to be an ineffective strategy for energy reductions with the exception of a select few products. Supply chain energy reductions may be more promising than manufacturing energy reductions, though neither is likely to be as effective as strategies that target use phase energy reductions.
机译:尽管可再生能源正在日趋成熟,但提高能效可能会提供减少能源消耗和随之而来的温室气体排放的机会,以弥合当前排放量与为防止气候变化产生严重影响而必须减少的排放量之间的差距,并且将继续是温室气体排放政策不可或缺的一部分。由于希望出于货币,环境和其他原因减少能源消耗的消费者面临障碍,因此住宅能源在很大程度上是未开发的能源削减来源。其中一个障碍是缺乏对房屋中能源消耗的知识或了解,以及如何通过行为和技术变化有效地减少能源消耗。一种增进对居民能源消耗的了解的方法是通过创建模型来预测根据该房屋的各种特性,将出现哪些电器和电子产品,并对该房屋的电力消耗做出重大贡献。该模型的基础是来自住宅能耗调查(RECS)的可公开获得的调查数据。通过预测家庭可能的能源消费方式,房主,政策制定者和其他利益相关者可以获取有价值的数据,从而减少住宅部门的能源消耗。该模型可用于选择可以减少能耗的成熟房屋,并预测作为这些潜在减排基础的电器。这项工作表明,美国大多数家庭拥有大约8种电器,这些电器占该家庭用电量的80%。人口普查区域,占地面积,收入和总用电量等特征会影响家庭中可能使用的设备,但是设备数量通常约为8。通常需要4台设备才能达到50%的阈值,而12台设备家电达到90%的用电量,这表明有兴趣监控家电级别用电的各方的收益将显着减少。;另一种提高对住宅能耗的了解的方法是通过开发用于经济投入的住宅使用阶段能量矢量-输出生命周期评估(EIO-LCA)模型。 EIO-LCA模型是预测经济活动对环境影响的有价值的范围界定工具。该工具的功能存在差距,因为住宅使用阶段的能源不在模型范围内。将使用阶段能量向量添加到EIO-LCA模型中将改善建模,提供更完整的能量影响估计,并允许将嵌入的能量与使用阶段能量进行比较,以在住宅部门购买商品和服务。这项工作为该模型的住宅能源部门增加了21 Quads的能源,为个人运输增加了15 Quads的能源。这些增加代表了美国总能源消耗的三分之一,以及EIO-LCA模型中总能源消耗的三分之一。这项工作还表明,对于许多产品(例如电子产品和家用电器),使用阶段的能量需求远大于制造能量需求,并且支配着这些产品的生命周期。通过探索房屋中潜在的能源消耗来消耗房屋中的能源。该分析选择了在家庭中使用或消费的产品,并探索了使用EIO-LCA和第3章中创建的能量矢量来减少嵌入式制造和使用该产品的相能量的潜力。结果使消费者了解在他们购买的产品的生命周期中消耗能量的地方,并为决策者提供有关如何集中或重新确定旨在减少住宅部门能源消耗的政策的宝贵信息。这项工作发现,零售产品消耗的大部分能量是在电子产品和电器的使用阶段消耗的。因此,可以在同一地区发现最大的住宅能源使用量减少潜力。这项工作还表明,针对目标是降低许多产品的制造能源可能是一种无效的节能战略,只有少数产品除外。供应链的节能减排可能比制造的节能减排更有希望,尽管这两种方法都不能像针对使用阶段节能的战略那样有效。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carlson, Derrick R.;

  • 作者单位

    Carnegie Mellon University.;

  • 授予单位 Carnegie Mellon University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Environmental.;Energy.;Sustainability.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 221 p.
  • 总页数 221
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号