首页> 外文会议>World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies >Academic Dishonesty Prevention in E-learning University System
【24h】

Academic Dishonesty Prevention in E-learning University System

机译:电子学习大学体系中的学术不诚实预防

获取原文

摘要

This article shows the ways of prevention academic dishonesty in e-learning. We reveal this phenomenon as a complex social notion in the context of the sociology of communication and the Internet and educational data mining. The main categories of academic dishonesty are considered in the paper: cheating, plagiarism and collusion. Cheating is shown in details because it is associated with the tests during the e-learning course. The authors carried out a substantial analysis of academic dishonesty in e-learning and it's prevention using more than 50 examples covering the experience of various countries and higher education systems. The most interesting case shows measures preventing extension for Google Chrome PolyTestHelper. The main conclusion of the study proves the priority of preventive measures. It is obvious that the problem of cheating cannot be solved purely technically, since a technical war can last forever. At the present stage of information and communication technologies widespread usage a situation of prohibition or significant restrictions in e-learning environment may seem contrived to students. False results of anti-cheat programs can seriously undermine the trust between students and teachers. The ideal way to prevent academic dishonesty is to perform tasks including creative academic elements. Nevertheless, this way is not universal because these are mass courses with a regular enrollment of several thousand students, with a fully automatic verification of academic results.
机译:本文展示了电子学习中预防学术不诚实的方法。在通信社会学和互联网和教育数据挖掘的情况下,我们将这种现象视为复杂的社会概念。本文考虑了主要类别的学术不诚实:作弊,抄袭和勾结。在详细中显示作弊,因为它与电子学习课程中的测试相关联。作者对电子学习的学术不诚实进行了大量分析,并使用50多个例子预防涵盖各国和高等教育系统的经验。最有趣的案例显示了防止Google Chrome Polytesthelper的扩展。该研究的主要结论证明了预防措施的优先事项。很明显,欺骗性不能纯粹技术上都无法解决,因为技术战争可以永远持续。在当前的信息和通信技术阶段,广泛使用禁令或在电子学习环境中的严重限制的情况可能似乎与学生进行了学习。防欺诈计划的虚假结果可以严重破坏学生和教师之间的信任。防止学术不诚实的理想方式是执行包括创造性学术元素的任务。尽管如此,这种方式并不普遍,因为这些是常规课程,常规入学了数千名学生,全自动验证了学术结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号