首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Green Buildings and Sustainable Cities >Is LEED leading Asia?: an analysis of global adaptation and trends
【24h】

Is LEED leading Asia?: an analysis of global adaptation and trends

机译:是LEED领导亚洲吗?:对全球适应和趋势的分析

获取原文

摘要

Green buildings are increasingly gaining attention in the building industry globally. Green building rating systems have beer instrumental in driving this front. Increasing number of green rated buildings and the national and international level rating system; speak for the importance of green buildings. A majority if not all rating systems are established on the same fundamental principle! which are reflected in their credit categories, credit distribution and weighting. Life Cycle Assessment has been adopted in LEEE rating system to rationalize the possible impacts and hence the credit weighting. Although the logic is well rationalized, this distribution is not reflected in actual practice due to many reasons such as cost implications, practical limitations and regiona variations. Therefore certain credit categories that are most prevalent in LEED rated projects in the US might not be reflectec important in LEED rated projects in Asia. Considering the rapidly progressing adaptation of LEED system in Asia, this paper intends to explore adaptation trends in LEEE system comparing projects in the US and in Asia. Our study analyses fifty urban office projects in the US and in Asia that have achieved either Gold or Platinum level rating under LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations rating system version i and 2.2. Size of the projects will be determined by benchmarks specified by Core & Shell system. Data will be primarily obtainec from LEED score sheets. Data will be analysed based on simple statistical analysis methods. Findings are expected to reflect hov rating system requirements are adopted in practice, and regional trends and which will lead to suggestions how rating systems should be more encompassing and be inline with practical implementation.
机译:绿色建筑越来越越来越受到全球建筑业的关注。绿色建筑评级系统在驾驶前面有啤酒乐器。越来越多的绿色额定建筑物和国家和国际等级评级系统;言论为绿色建筑的重要性。如果并非所有评级系统都在相同的基本原则上建立了大多数情况!这反映在他们的信用类别,信用分布和加权中。 LEEE评级系统采用生命周期评估,以合理化可能的影响,从而合理化信贷加权。虽然逻辑合理化了很好,但由于成本影响,实际限制和地区变化等许多原因,这种分布在实际实践中没有反映。因此,某些信用类别在美国LEED评级项目中最普遍的信用类别可能在亚洲LEED评级项目中可能不是反弹。考虑到LEED系统在亚洲的迅速进展,本文旨在探讨LEEE系统的适应趋势,比较美国和亚洲的项目。我们的研究分析了美国和亚洲的五十个城市办公室项目,在LEED为新建筑和主要装修评级系统版I和2.2下实现了在LEED下的黄金或铂金水平评级。项目的大小将由核心和shell系统指定的基准确定。数据将主要从LEED评分板获取。基于简单的统计分析方法将分析数据。预计调查结果将反映霍夫评级系统要求在实践中采用以及区域趋势,并导致建议评级系统应该更加包散,并与实际实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号