首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology >Comparison of the major flavonoid content of raw and steamed Scutellariae Radix by high-performance liquid chromatography
【24h】

Comparison of the major flavonoid content of raw and steamed Scutellariae Radix by high-performance liquid chromatography

机译:高效液相色谱法的原料和蒸碎片鳞状基质主要类黄酮含量的比较

获取原文

摘要

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different extraction methods on the major flavonoid content of raw and steamed Scutellariae radix by applying high-performance liquid chromatography. Eight extraction methods such as extraction method in 2010 Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChPmethod), water refluxing extraction (WTRE-method), 60% ethanol refluxing extraction (ETRE-method), ultrasonic-assisted aqueous extraction (UAAE-method), ultrasonic-assisted 60% ethanol extraction (UAEE-method), cellulase-assisted solvent extraction (CASE-method), pectinase-assisted solvent extraction (PASE-method), and double-enzyme-assisted solvent extraction (DEASE-method) were investigated. The content ranges of baicalin (BG), wogonoside (WG), baicalein (BA), and wogonin (WO) in raw Scutellariae radix by using ChP-, ETRE-, UAEE-, WTRE-method were 194.91~226.50, 69.90~77.11, 33.30~68.83, and 15.83~20.40 μmol g~(-1) herbals, respectively; while those by using UAAE-, CASE-, PASE-, DEASE-method were 3.81~7.17, 14.34~26.50, 134.70~227.58, and 42.92~46.79 μmol g~(-1) herbals, respectively. The result showed that the effects of different extraction methods on the major flavonoid content in raw Scutellariae radix were very significant. However, the content ranges of BG, WG, BA and WO in steamed Scutellariae radix by using eight extraction methods were 196.48~239.94, 67.99~79.93, 33.30~71.42, and 9.85~22.87 μmol g-1 herbals, respectively. Compared with raw Scutellariae radix, the effects of different extraction methods on the major flavonoid content in steamed Scutellariae radix were not significant. Based on these findings, the extraction method and the extraction solvent selected could influence the content of the bioactive flavonoids extracted from Scutellariae radix, and the processing could also do it.
机译:进行该研究以评估不同提取方法对原料和蒸碳酸碱基含量的主要类黄酮含量,施加高效液相色谱法。八种提取方法例如在2010年中国药典(ChPmethod),水回流提取(WTRE法),60%乙醇回流提取(ETRE法),超声辅助的水提取(UAAE法)提取法,超声辅助的60 %乙醇萃取(UAEE方法),纤维素酶辅助的溶剂提取(CASE法),果胶酶辅助溶剂萃取(PASE法),和双酶辅助溶剂萃取(迪斯方法)进行了研究。黄芩苷的含量范围(BG),汉黄芩苷(WG),黄芩素(BA),汉黄芩素和(WO)在生黄芩通过使用CHP-,ETRE-,UAEE-,WTRE-方法是194.91〜226.50,69.90〜77.11 ,33.30〜68.83,15.83和20.40〜微摩尔克〜(-1)草药,分别;而那些通过使用UAAE-,区分,PASE-,迪斯-方法是3.81〜7.17,14.34〜26.50,134.70〜227.58,和42.92〜46.79微摩尔克〜(-1)草药,分别。结果表明,不同萃取方法对原始瘢痕疙瘩基质的主要黄酮含量的影响非常显着。然而,通过使用八个提取方法在蒸黄芩的BG,WG,BA和WO含量范围分别为196.48〜239.94,67.99〜79.93,33.30〜71.42,和9.85〜22.87微摩尔G-1草药。与原始鳞状菌拉氏菌相比,不同提取方法对蒸碳碎屑液中主要类黄酮含量的影响并不重要。基于这些发现,所选择的提取方法和萃取溶剂可以影响从Cocullariae基数中提取的生物活性类黄酮的含量,并且加工也可以进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号