首页> 外文会议>American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >A CROSS-NATIONAL INVESTIGATION OF CONFIDENCE IN ABET SKILLS AND KOLB LEARNING STYLES: KOREA AND THE UNITED STATES
【24h】

A CROSS-NATIONAL INVESTIGATION OF CONFIDENCE IN ABET SKILLS AND KOLB LEARNING STYLES: KOREA AND THE UNITED STATES

机译:对儿童技能和KOLB学习风格的跨国对信心的跨国思考:韩国和美国

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this paper, we examine confidence levels in ABET skills and Kolb learning style preferences in lower division students in project-based design courses offered at the University of California at Berkeley and the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. With data obtained from online surveys, we compared confidence in ABET-related engineering and design skills by country and gender. We used the learning styles defined by David Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory, for its strong connection with design processes as well as learning. Kolb's model defines four learning styles, which are each highlighted in different stages of design. The results highlight national and gender differences in students' perception of their development in ABET-related skills. The American students rated themselves higher in creativity, teamwork, ethics, facility with tools of engineering practice, and in recognizing global impact. The Korean students assessed their skills higher in design, problem solving, and communication skills. There was no statistically significant difference in leadership or analytical skills. However, in spite of apparent national differences, the students follow similar gender patterns. The men were more confident in technical and analytical skills, while the women were more confident in communication and teamwork skills. As such, both cultures could benefit from interventions that build skills and confidence in each area.
机译:在本文中,我们在加州大学伯克利和韩国先进科学与技术研究所提供的基于项目的设计课程中的低级技能和KOLB学习风格偏好的信心水平。通过从在线调查获得的数据,我们将对与国家和性别的儿童有关的工程和设计技巧进行了比较了信心。我们使用了David Kolb的体验学习理论定义的学习方式,以其与设计过程的强大连接以及学习。 Kolb的模型定义了四种学习方式,每个学习方式都突出显示了不同的设计阶段。结果突出了学生对与儿童相关技能发展发展的思想界定的国家和性别差异。美国学生在创造力,团队合作,道德,设施的工具方面享有更高的工程实践,以及认识到全球影响。韩国学生在设计,解决问题和沟通技巧方面评估了他们的技能。领导或分析技能没有统计上显着的差异。然而,尽管存在明显的国家差异,但学生们遵循类似的性别模式。这些人对技术和分析技能更自信,而女性对沟通和团队合作的技能更加自信。因此,这两种文化都可以受益于在每个地区建立技能和信心的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号