首页> 外文会议>American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >TOWARD A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF ACADEMIC AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF FACTORS RELATED TO PERSISTENCE IN ENGINEERING
【24h】

TOWARD A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF ACADEMIC AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF FACTORS RELATED TO PERSISTENCE IN ENGINEERING

机译:更好地了解学术和社会融合:对工程持久性有关的定性研究

获取原文

摘要

In general, the challenge to produce more engineers in the United States can be understood as two-pronged: (a) recruiting students to the field of engineering; and (b) retaining students in the discipline. There have been considerable efforts to recruit additional students to engineering which have yielded modest results. However, the increase in enrollment has not coincided with an increase in engineering graduates. Therefore the departure of students from the discipline remains an issue. Using a recently proposed model of engineer retention by Veenstra et al., this paper examines the first-year experience to better understand the issue of retention in engineering focusing specifically on the broad variables of academic and social integration. Using semi-structured interviews, I asked questions relating to students' expectations of the first year, motivation to pursue an engineering degree, satisfaction with the first year and academic and social interactions. The students in the study were first-year students who were completing the second semester of a two-semester introductory engineering sequence. The sample consisted of ten students. The findings highlight key factors of academic and social integration as perceived by the participants. I argue that within an academic discipline, the lines between academic and social integration in the student experience are blurred such that a general term such as "sense of belonging" is more appropriate. Two main themes emerged from the data with regards to students' sense of belonging: (a) the impact of participants' connectivity with peers, faculty and the College of Engineering; and (b) the extent of participants' socialization to the engineering profession. The primary contribution of these findings is a better understanding of the engineering student experience that suggests a revision to Veenstra et al.'s Model of Engineering Student Retention. In addition, these findings extend previous recommendations related to first-year engineering instructional and student support practices aiming to improve retention rates. Finally the results suggest specific avenues for further research into the impact of these factors on retention rates and the viability of the proposed model.
机译:一般而言,在美国生产更多工程师的挑战可以理解为双管齐全:(a)招募学生到工程领域; (b)留在纪律的学生。招聘额外的学生对工程有相当大的努力,从而产生了适度的结果。然而,入学人数的增加尚未恰逢工程毕业生的增加。因此,来自学科的学生的离开仍然是一个问题。 veenstra等人使用最近提出的工程师保留模型,本文审查了更好地了解工程保留问题的一年体验,专门针对学术和社会融合的广泛变量。使用半结构化访谈,我向学生对第一年的期望提出了问题,激励工程学位,与第一年和学术和社会互动的满意度。研究中的学生是一年的学生,他们完成了两学期的双学期介绍工程序列。该样本由十名学生组成。该研究结果强调了参与者所感知的学术和社会融合的关键因素。我认为,在学术学科中,学生经验中的学术和社会融合之间的线条被模糊,使得诸如“归属感”等一般术语更为合适。关于学生归属感的数据出现了两个主要主题:(a)与会者与对同龄人,教师和工程学院的关系的影响; (b)参与者社会化对工程专业的程度。这些调查结果的主要贡献是更好地了解工程学生经验,表明对Veenstra等人进行修订。的工程学生保留模式。此外,这些调查结果还扩展了与旨在提高保留率的一年工程教学和学生支持实践相关的建议。最后,结果表明了进一步研究这些因素对保留率的影响以及所提出的模型的可行性的特定途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号