首页> 外文会议>American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >TRACKING MIDDLE SCHOOL PERCEPTIONS OF ENGINEERING DURING AN INQUIRY BASED ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND DESIGN CURRICULUM
【24h】

TRACKING MIDDLE SCHOOL PERCEPTIONS OF ENGINEERING DURING AN INQUIRY BASED ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND DESIGN CURRICULUM

机译:追踪探究式工程科学与设计课程中工程的中学看法

获取原文

摘要

As the United States tries to remain technologically competitive with other nations the demand for engineering professionals is expected to increase. Since the early 1990's, many K-12 engineering outreach programs have been incorporated into middle schools either through high tech electives or in tandem with the State prescribed math and science curriculum with the intent of fostering student interest in science and engineering. In spite of both approaches the ratio of science and engineering degrees awarded annually to the college aged population in the U.S. is less than in other countries. Furthermore, the number of underrepresented minorities earning those degrees is 12% according to the National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc. Some K-12 programs focus on mutual concepts that appear in both engineering and the physical sciences (engineering science) rather than design and problem solving (engineering design). It is no coincidence then that middle school students do not know what engineers are or what they do in practice. Hence, they do not choose engineering as a possible career choice. While the former has its merits with regard to enriching math and science education for students, the later is necessary for a true understanding of engineering as a profession. Here we examine changes in students' attitudes toward math and science, as well as their development of ideas about engineering after receiving instruction using both approaches - a science curriculum with integrated engineering concepts and applications; and through an engineering design and technology curriculum. Similar trends were observed in both groups. Specifically, we examine the responses from a 5th grade science class and both 6th and 8th grade robotics classes, who participated in the National Science Foundation (NSF) sponsored GK-12 Program with Drexel University in Philadelphia, PA. In each class, a doctoral candidate in an engineering discipline developed and delivered lessons and activities along with the teacher. Fellows were responsible for designing inquiry-based lessons to enhance the understanding of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) concepts with the purpose of inspiring students to eventually pursue engineering disciplines. In the 5th grade class lessons and experiments were geared toward strengthening the understanding of the science curriculum, using engineering as a contextual vehicle for greater understanding. In the 6th and 8th grade class activities were based on engineering design with a focus on the physical sciences. Both classes completed two surveys at the beginning and at the end of the 2008-2009 school year - an open-ended survey about engineering and a closed-ended survey about attitudes toward math and science. Survey responses at the beginning of the school year revealed that overwhelmingly students defined an engineer as 'a person who fixes things.' They could not identify specific tasks or problems solved by engineers or any of the technological tools that engineers use. Students did not personally know an engineer and could not identify more than one type of engineer. We present how the attitudes toward math, science and engineering changed over the course of the year between the two classes. We also discuss ways to design a better engineering curriculum at the middle school level based on our experiences.
机译:由于美国试图保持与其他国家对工程人才的需求预计将增加技术上的竞争力。自90年代初,许多K-12工程推广方案已经通过高科技选修课或与意图促进在科学和工程学生兴趣的国家规定的数学和科学课程串联纳入中学任。尽管这两种办法的科学和工程学位每年颁发给大学老年人口在美国的比例低于其他国家。此外,少数族裔收入的程度的数量是根据国家行动理事会在工程少数民族12%,公司的一些K-12计划的重点出现在工程相互概念和物理科学(工程科学),而不是设计和解决问题的能力(工程设计)。这不是巧合那么初中学生不知道他们在实践中做的工程师都是什么,或者什么。因此,他们不选择工程作为一个可能的职业选择。虽然前者对于丰富数学和学生科学教育其可取之处,后来是必要的工程真正理解作为一种职业。在这里,我们检查学生对数学和科学态度的变化,以及它们的使用方法都收到指令后对工程的发展思路 - 与集成工程概念和应用的科学课程;并通过工程设计和技术课程。两组观察到类似的趋势。具体来说,我们考察从五年级科学课和两个第6和第8年级机器人类,谁参加了美国国家科学基金会(NSF)资助的GK-12计划在宾夕法尼亚州费城Drexel大学的响应。在每一个类,工程领域的博士候选人开发并与老师一起提供的课程和活动。研究员负责设计探究式的经验教训,加强科学,技术,工程的理解,并与启发学生最终的目的,数学(STEM)的概念追求工程学科。在五年级的班级授课和实验,对加强科学课程的理解,运用工程为更好地理解上下文车辆减速。在第6和第8年级课堂活动是根据工程设计为重点的物理学。这两个类都完成了在开始和2008-2009学年年底的两次调查 - 对工程的开放式调查,对有关数学和科学态度,封闭结束调查。在学年开始调查反馈显示,绝大多数学生定义的工程师为“一个人谁修复的东西。”他们无法确定具体的任务或由工程师或任何的工程师使用技术手段解决的问题。学生没有亲自知道一个工程师,无法识别多种类型的工程师。我们目前对数学,科学和工程的态度如何改变了过去一年中的两个类之间的过程。我们还讨论了如何在基于我们的经验中学水平,设计出更好的工程课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号