首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference >Recognizing, Characterizing and 'Unsettling' Unintended Bias in the Faculty Search Process in Engineering - A Case Study
【24h】

Recognizing, Characterizing and 'Unsettling' Unintended Bias in the Faculty Search Process in Engineering - A Case Study

机译:在工程中的教师搜索过程中认识到,表征和“令人不安”的意外偏见 - 以案例研究

获取原文

摘要

Faculty searches are one of the most critical activities undertaken with regards to shaping the future of a department, college or university. Despite the importance of this activity, most search committees are comprised of faculty who have very little time to commit to this task, and little if any training on 'best practices' or policies for conducting searches. National recognition of the need in faculty search processes for decision-makers to understand the prevalence of unintended biases and how to combat them has grown precipitously in recent years. Cognitive scientists have shown that many of the selection and evaluation processes we undertake on a daily basis are alarmingly contaminated, despite our good intentions. The term 'cognitive errors' has been coined to describe such errors in judgment. The objectivity of these evaluations is further compromised when we are overburdened and distracted. Common beliefs about how women and men, people of color and white people, act, feel, and express themselves often unintentionally enter into our decision-making processes. This is true even among people who eschew sexism and racism-because beliefs about gender and about race are part of the social norms of our society. Few of us stop to consider how taken-for-granted beliefs and expectations might be affecting our decisions. It is in this manner that gender and race biases commonly impact faculty search processes. In turn, engineering departments continue to struggle with hiring highly qualified women faculty. However, there are strategies to minimize the impact of unintended bias on faculty search results. In this paper, we discuss two examples of faculty search processes in which biases were demonstrated both in conversations and evaluations within search committees and in letters of recommendation for candidates. The extensive research on cognitive errors is used to provide a systematic analysis of these examples and approaches to minimizing the impact of unintended bias through promoting awareness are presented.
机译:教师的搜索与问候着手塑造一个部门,学院或大学的未来最重要的活动之一。尽管活动的重要性,大多数搜索委员会是由教员谁很少有时间来致力于这项任务,并几乎没有对“最佳做法”或进行搜查政策的任何训练。在为决策者教员搜索过程需要了解意想不到的偏见的流行,以及如何对付这些国家承认最近几年急剧增长。认知科学家已经证明,许多我们每天的基础上进行选择和评价过程中的污染令人担忧,尽管我们的好意。术语“认知误区”已经被创造出来的判决来形容这样的错误。当我们不堪重负和分心这些评价的客观性进一步损害。关于男女,色与白色的人,行为,感觉的人,以及如何表达自己共同的信念常常无意中进入到我们的决策过程。这是真实的,即使当中谁避开性别歧视和种族歧视,因为对性别和关于种族的信仰是我们社会的社会规范的一部分人。我们很少停下来考虑如何采取换理所当然的信念和期望可能会影响我们的决定。正是在这种方式性别和种族偏见普遍影响教师的搜索过程。反过来,工程部门继续奋斗与雇用高素质的师资队伍的女性。不过,也有战略,尽量减少意外的偏见对教师的搜索结果的影响。在本文中,我们将讨论其中的偏见正是在对话和搜索委员会内部评估和候选人的推荐信,证明教师的搜索过程中的两个例子。认知错误的广泛的研究来提供这些例子了系统的分析和办法,以尽量减少意外的偏见,通过提高认识出现的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号