首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Education Technology and Computer >Online formative assessment using automated essay scoring technology in China and U.S.— Two case studies
【24h】

Online formative assessment using automated essay scoring technology in China and U.S.— Two case studies

机译:在在中国和美国自动化论文评分技术的在线形成评估 - 两种案例研究

获取原文

摘要

Automated essay scoring (AES) has benefits such as time saving for teachers, immediate diagnostic feedback and reliable score reporting. This paper reports two case studies of using online automated essay scoring technology as formative assessment tool in the Chinese and the U.S. classrooms. In the first case study, we report how Writing Roadmap 2.0 (WRM 2.0), an online formative assessment tool, is integrated in the West Virginia classrooms, U.S.A. In the second case study, we summarize a pilot study on Writing Roadmap 2.0 use in the English writing classrooms in Beijing. We present two-year empirical data from the state of West Virginia online writing assessments to exam the effects of classroom formative assessment using Writing Roadmap 2.0 AES program on the state summative writing assessment scores. Consistent and statistically significant positive mean score differences on the state summative writing test were found for students practiced using WRM 2.0 software compared to students who did not practice. The largest score gain was found for low performing students who practiced 4 or more times compared to no practice students from the same performance level. In the case study in Beijing China Foreign Affairs University (CFAU), we found that the AI-scoring writing program alone is not sufficient for improving student writing. EFL English teachers need professional development to integrate online formative assessment in teaching. Teachers and students experience role changing when AI essay scoring software is used in the classroom. Understanding the online writing score feedback and transforming the immediate score data information to actions is the key to success.
机译:自动化论文评分(AES)具有诸如教师,即时诊断反馈和可靠的评分报告节省时间的好处。本文报告了在中国和美国教室中使用在线自动化论文评分技术作为形成性评估工具的两种案例研究。在第一种案例研究中,我们报告了在第二个案例研究中融入了在美国弗吉尼亚州的西弗吉尼亚课堂上融合了RoadMap 2.0(WRM 2.0)的如何写入,我们总结了关于写作路线图2.0的试验研究英语写作北京教室。我们展示了来自西弗吉尼亚州的两年的经验数据在线写作评估,以在国家总结书写评估分数上写下路线图2.0 AES计划考试课堂形成性评估的影响。与没有练习的学生相比,使用WRM 2.0软件练习的学生发现了一致的和统计学上显着的正平均分比分数差异。与没有相同的性能水平的练习学生相比,练习4次或更多次的低表演学生被发现最大的得分收益。在北京中国外交大学(CFAU)的案例研究中,我们发现单独的AI评分写作计划不足以改善学生写作。 EFL英语教师需要专业发展,以整合在线教学中的在线形成评估。教师和学生在课堂使用AI散文评分软件时,体验职位变化。了解在线写入评分反馈并将立即分数数据信息转换为操作是成功的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号