【24h】

Internet Governance : Some Thoughts after the two WSIS

机译:互联网治理:两个WSIS之后的一些想法

获取原文

摘要

The challenges faced by the globalisation of our Information Society are numerous and crucial for the future of our democracies. The two WSIS have tried to answer these challenges by proclaiming new rights and overall a new way for governing the Internet. This paper focuses on two major debates: the first one circumvents the right to “Universal Access” viewed as the right for everyone to become a “netizen”. This includes participation in the Information Society, which incorporates not only the right to be connected to the infrastructure, not only the right to gain access to the informational richness available on the Net but also the possibility for everybody to take part in the large discussion forum that is the Internet. The discussion about Internet Governance was the major topic at the Tunis Agenda. The WSIS definitively advocated a transparent, multistakeholder and co-regulatory approach. What does this mean? What role might ICANN fulfil – do we need to reform that organisation? Among the stakeholders, particularly the international organisations, who are the real winners and who is losing? Might the EU approach to co-regulation be taken as a model for Internet governance? All these questions are raised, even if they are not solved, in our comments.
机译:我们的信息社会全球化面临的挑战对我们民主国家的未来无论多么重要。这两个WSIS试图通过宣布新权利和整体用于互联网的新方式来回答这些挑战。本文重点介绍了两项重大辩论:第一个避免“普遍接入”的权利,以便为每个人成为“网友”。这包括参与信息社会,这些社会不仅纳入基础设施的权利,不仅是获得网上可用信息丰富的权利,而且只有每个人参加大型讨论论坛的可能性这是互联网。关于互联网治理的讨论是突尼斯议程的主要话题。 WSIS明确地倡导了透明,多利益相关者和共同监管方法。这是什么意思? ICANN的职责如何实现 - 我们是否需要改革该组织?在利益攸关方中,特别是国际组织,是真正的赢家和谁失败?欧盟协调方案是否可以作为互联网治理的典范?在我们的评论中,即使他们没有解决,也会提出所有这些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号