首页> 外文会议>International Technology,Education and Development Conference >(250)THE EFFICACY OF WEB PROBLEM BASED LEARNING VERSUSTRADITIONAL DISCIPLINE LEARNING IN BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES
【24h】

(250)THE EFFICACY OF WEB PROBLEM BASED LEARNING VERSUSTRADITIONAL DISCIPLINE LEARNING IN BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES

机译:(250)基于Web问题基于学习的血栓化学科学习在生物医学科学中的疗效

获取原文

摘要

Recent years have witnessed the developments of different educational methods in themedical field, including the electronic learning (e-learning) and wed problem-basedlearning (WPBL) approach. These methods are coming in favour over the traditionallearning method, which was a dominated educational method for decades. Here weassess different educational methods in Medical School at Taibah University, KSA.Methods: This is an experimental control study that has been carried out over 2academic years in the Faculty of Medicine, Taibah University, KSA. A 162 students fromthe 5th year of Medical School were involved in the study. Students were studying FamilyMedicine course as a block over 10 weeks. Students were randomly divided into 3groups: (i) Group A, (46 students) studied the course by WPBL, (ii) Group B, (49students) studied the course by WPBL with e-portfolio, and (iii) Group C, (67 students)studied the course with traditional learning. To measure the efficacy of different teachingmethods, the outcome of the final total score (measuring knowledge and clinical skills),the score of problem solving/critical thinking exam, and the total DREEM score(measuring the education environment) were assessed. In addition, the different DREEMelements were also assessed. Data were analyzed using statistical package for socialsciences (SPSS) program. ANOVA test was used to compare different groups with postHoc analysis (bonferroni) as multi-comparison test with significant level (P<0.05). Thestudy was funded by the deanship of scientific research, Taibah University, KSA.Results: All groups were matched for sex and age (P value>0.05), The results ofassessing different teaching methods showed that Group B has the highest score forproblem solving/critical thinking exam (max 100) and total DREEM score (max 200) withmean 84.79±3.45 and 110.46±13.82, respectively. Whereas, Group C showed the lowestscore for problem solving/critical thinking exam and total DREEM score with mean76.97±3.79 and 101.97±15.89, respectively. Comparing means among different groupsA, B, and C using ANOVA test showed a significant differences among different groupswith P value<0.05. The results from the final exam score (max 100) showed that Group Ahas the highest score (mean 70±4.51) and Group C has the lowest score (mean73.57±5.31) with significant difference among different groups (P value 0.011).Multi-comparison test-post Hoc analysis showed that there is a significant differencebetween group B and C (P value=0.014) in the total DREEM score, and there is a highlysignificant difference between group A and C (P value=0.000) for problem solving/criticalthinking exam. Discussion: Here we showed that the web problem based learning hasbetter outcomes compared to traditional learning regarding problem solving, criticalthinking skills, retention of knowledge, in addition to the overall educational environment..Moreover, the present work showed that student’s who studied the family medicinecourse with WPBL method either with or without e-portfolio have better perception ofalmost all educational environmental elements these results are similar to studies in bothmedical and nonmedical literature.
机译:近年来已经见证了主题领域不同教育方法的发展,包括电子学习(电子学习)和基于WED问题 - 基于WPBL的方法。这些方法涉及传统结构的方法,这是几十年的占主导地位的教育方法。在这里,Taibah University医学院的不同教育方法,KSA.Methods:这是一个实验对照研究,该研究已经过2年在医学院,Taibah大学,KSA。这项研究中有162名医学院的学生参与了这项研究。学生将FamilyMedicine课程留在10周内。学生被随机分为3个小组:(i)A组,(46名学生)通过WPBL研究了课程,(ii)B组,(49学士)通过e-portfolio和(iii)组的Wpbl学习课程,( 67名学生学习了传统学习的课程。为了测量不同教学方法的疗效,最终总分(衡量知识和临床技能)的结果,解决问题/关键思维考试的分数,以及评估总部分数(测量教育环境)。此外,还评估了不同的防御性。使用统计包进行分析数据,用于社交课程(SPSS)计划。 ANOVA测试用于将不同组与POSTHOC分析(Bonferroni)进行比较,作为具有显着水平的多比较试验(P <0.05)。 Thestudy是由科学研究的Deanship资助的,KSA.Results:所有群体都与性别和年龄相匹配(P值> 0.05),不同的教学方法的结果表明,B组具有最高分辨率/批判性的分数思考考试(最多100)和总检测分数(MAX 200)分别使用84.79±3.45和110.46±13.82。虽然,C组显示了解决问题/关键思维考试的低速,分别为含量76.97±3.79和101.97±15.89分别进行了解决问题/批判性思维考试和总部分数。使用ANOVA测试的不同G组,B和C之间的比较手段显示出不同的基团P值<0.05之间的显着差异。最终考试评分(MAX 100)的结果表明,AHAS最高分(平均70±4.51)和组C具有最低分数(平均值73.57±5.31),不同组之间具有显着差异(P值0.011)。多比较测试后HOC分析表明,在总旅游评分中,B和C组(P值= 0.014)存在显着突出的差异,并且在A和C(P值= 0.000)之间存在具有重要差异的问题解决/临界思考考试。讨论:这里我们展示了基于Web问题的学习Hastbetter结果与传统学习有关解决问题,临界思考技巧,保留知识,除了整体教育环境之外..本作,学生们研究了家庭法属的谁随着WPBL方法,无论是没有电子产品组合,都对所有教育环境要素的最佳看法,这些结果与医疗和非医疗文献中的研究类似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号