首页> 外文会议>IPC Printed Circuits Expo, Apex, and the Designers Summit >Effect of OSP Chemistry on the Hole Fill Performance During Pb-free Wave Soldering
【24h】

Effect of OSP Chemistry on the Hole Fill Performance During Pb-free Wave Soldering

机译:OSP化学对PB免波焊接期间填充性能的影响

获取原文

摘要

This paper analyzes the differences in plated through hole fill performance between the regular OSP and Pb-free OSP PCB surface finish chemistries in a Pb-free wave solder process. The variables studied include two board thicknesses - 93mil and 125mil, three hole sizes - pin plus 16, 24 and 40mils, internal Cu layer connections - single and three plane layer connections, two pin shapes - circular and rectangular and two reflow atmospheric preconditions -^sNitrogen and Air. A SnPb control was included for the 93mil thick test board. The bare PCBs were initially subjected to 220°C and 240°C peak reflow process twice for the SnPb and Pb-free wave soldering samples, respectively. This was followed by a wash process before wave soldering. The Pb-free wave soldering results indicated that the Pb-free OSP performed better than the regular OSP chemistry by 15% under air and 40% under nitrogen reflow preconditioning. In Pb-free wave soldering, the air preconditioning resulted in better hole fill than nitrogen. Board to board variation of hole fill was much lower in the Pb-free OSP chemistry compared to regular OSP. Plated through hole size of 40mils and 16mils, larger than the pin diameter proved to be best and worst designs for the 125mil PCB, respectively. The SnPb control almost had greater than 92% average hole fill for every design variable in this experiment. Overall, the results indicated that the regular OSP chemistry in Pb-free wave soldering failed to meet the 50% hole fill required per IPC-A-610, for all the conditions studied. The 125mil thick PCB using Pb-free OSP chemistry also failed to meet the IPC requirements for all the conditions evaluated. However, the 93mil thick PCB using Pb-free OSP chemistry was able to meet this 50% hole fill requirement(although not meeting the general 75% minimum requirement), except when the hole diameter is 16mils larger than the pin.
机译:本文分析了PB免波焊接过程中常设OSP和PB无伺服OSP PCB表面光学化学物质之间镀孔填充性能的差异。所研究的变量包括两个板厚度 - 93mil和125mil,三个孔尺寸 - 销加16,24和40mils,内部Cu层连接 - 单个和三个平面层连接,两个引脚形状 - 圆形和矩形和两个回流大气预处理 - ^鼻涕和空气。将SNPB控制包含在93mil厚测试板中。裸PCB分别用于SNPB和无铅波焊样品220℃和240°C峰值回流过程两次。然后在波焊前进行洗涤过程。无铅波峰焊接结果表明,无铅OSP在空气中比常规OSP化学表现优于常规OSP化学,在氮气回流预处理下40%。在无铅波峰焊接中,空气预处理导致更好的孔填充而不是氮。与常规OSP相比,无铅OSP化学的孔填充板的舷板变化远低得多。通过孔尺寸为40mils和16mils,大于引脚直径,分别被证明是125mil PCB的最佳和最差设计。 SNPB控制在本实验中的每个设计变量几乎具有大于92%的平均孔填充。总的来说,结果表明,对于所有IPC-A-610,无铅波峰焊接中的常规OSP化学未能满足50%的孔填充,对于所研究的所有条件。使用PB的OSP化学切换的125mil厚PCB也未能满足评估所有条件的IPC要求。然而,使用PB的OSP化学系统的93mil厚的PCB能够满足该50%的井填充要求(尽管没有满足一般的75%的最低要求),但是当孔直径为比销大16mils时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号