首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Blended vs. Flipped Teaching: One Course - Three Engineering Schools
【24h】

Blended vs. Flipped Teaching: One Course - Three Engineering Schools

机译:Blended VS.翻转教学:一门课程 - 三所工程学校

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

With recent evidence showing that active learning is more effective than traditional lecture, educators have begun to call for comparisons among various active learning and enhanced instructional techniques, rather than continuing to use lecture as the comparison standard, in determining which techniques may be best for different content areas and demographic groups (Freeman et al., 2014; Wieman, 2014; Weimer, 2016). To this end, our study explores blended versus flipped instruction for an engineering numerical methods course.
机译:随着最近的证据表明,积极学习比传统讲座更有效,教育工作者已经开始呼吁进行各种积极学习和增强的教学技术的比较,而不是继续使用讲座作为比较标准,在确定哪些技术可能最适合不同内容区域和人口统计组(Freeman等,2014年; Wieman,2014; Weimer,2016)。为此,我们的研究探讨了工程数值方法课程的混合与翻转指令。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号