首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Eliminating Lectures (and video lectures) in Large Introductory Materials Science and Engineering Courses: Large Gains in Student Learning
【24h】

Eliminating Lectures (and video lectures) in Large Introductory Materials Science and Engineering Courses: Large Gains in Student Learning

机译:在大型介绍材料科学与工程课程中消除讲座(和视频讲座):学生学习的大量收益

获取原文

摘要

Lecturing to passive students has dominated engineering education despite numerous studies that suggest learning is more effective and deeper if active methods are used. The current study is an attempt to compare learning gains, as measured by exam scores, between the traditional lecture with some (<10%) active learning activities and active learning class session where there was less than 10% of lecture. The work presented here will use the same 180 student class and the same instructor as both the control and intervention group. This introductory materials science and engineering class has been traditionally taught as three 50 minute lectures per week plus a 50 minute recitation. The experiment replaced one lecture a week with active learning activities and peer instruction while continuing to have traditional lectures the other two sessions per week. These active learning sessions were augmented by a short online quiz that students were required to take. They were permitted to retake the quiz as many times as needed to earn the score they desired. These quizzes were based on the reading assignments. An optional, short (<5 min) video was produced each week to replace the only component of lecture that was deemed valuable, inspiration. These videos were not intended to transfer any information. Rather, these short documentary style videos featured a different faculty member and their graduate students each week, sharing their passion for their research in the material that we wanted our students to study. Learning was assessed by tagging exam questions based on the presentation style (lecture or active learning) and comparing the data on two midterms and the final exam. All exams showed a significant difference in exam question score for concepts taught using active learning activities. For example, the final exam showed a 19% difference in the median score on the active learning tagged questions versus the traditional lecture tagged questions. The paper will include additional information on methodologies as well as additional results. We will also discuss our current approach to use the results from this study to guide revisions from the course, which is to eliminate lecture and focus on active engagement in problem solving during class time.
机译:尽管许多研究建议学习更有效并且如果使用过活跃方法,但如果使用了许多研究,则讲授工程学教育占据了工程教育。目前的研究是在传统讲座之间进行比考试分数来衡量的学习收益,其中一些(<10%)积极学习活动和有效学习课程的讲座的讲义不到10%。此处呈现的工作将使用相同的180名学生课程和与控制和干预组相同的教师。该介绍材料科学和工程类传统上被教授为每周三个50分钟的讲座加上50分钟的朗诵。该实验在一周内取代了一个讲座,积极学习活动和同伴指导,同时继续传统讲座每周其他两个会议。这些活跃的学习会议被学生所需的简短在线测验增强。他们被允许根据需要重新判断测验,以获得他们所需的分数。这些测验基于读取分配。每周制作一个可选的短(<5分钟)视频,以取代被视为有价值的讲座的唯一组成部分。这些视频并非旨在转移任何信息。相反,这些短信风格视频每周都有不同的教师和他们的研究生,分享他们对他们希望我们学生学习的材料的研究。通过基于演示方式(讲座或主动学习)标记考试问题并将数据进行评估,并在两个中期的数据和期末考试中进行评估。所有考试都显示出使用主动学习活动教授的概念的考试问题分数的显着差异。例如,期末考试表明,主动学习标记问题的中位数分数与传统讲座标记问题相比,差异为19%。本文将包括有关方法的附加信息以及其他结果。我们还将讨论我们目前使用本研究结果的方法,以指导课程的修订,这是消除讲座和专注于在课程中解决问题的主动参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号