首页> 外文会议>International Petroleum Technology Conference >Should Lessons Learned be the Blueprint for the Future
【24h】

Should Lessons Learned be the Blueprint for the Future

机译:应该学习的经验教训是未来的蓝图

获取原文

摘要

Do we need a journey through the past to make our future betterMany companies say they have a Lessons Learned process as part of their management system.Whilst the intent is sincere,a review of major accident events suggests this is not working.Why is there no sense of anxiety around this failure to learn and prevent reoccurrenceFrom a review of various major incidents around the world,we conclude that all possible lessons have not been learned from preceding events. In one sense,a failure to learn is understandable.Since catastrophic accidents are not common,it is easy for people to believe that similar incidents won’t happen to them.Their rarity also means that the generation who were in proximity to a major incident and were deeply affected by it,will in time move on.Trevor Kletz recognised this issue many years ago in his 1993 book,“Lessons from Disaster”or“How organisations have no memory and accidents recur.”(Kletz 1993) However,is this too pessimistic a viewWhat can we do about building more risk aware organisations and minimising reliance on active risk mitigation systemsMuch work has been done already,mainly in the field of identifying lessons to be learnt.This is not the same as actually learning the lessons,which is more difficult.We discuss the mechanisms at work which causes lessons not to be learned along with the various psychological characteristics and traits at play that can affect our ability to learn. This paper discusses the following essential features of an effective lessons learnt process: A requirement to look outside the organisation and industry for sharing of lessons to learned; A process which goes beyond identifying the lessons to be learnt but has a method to embed or internalise the lessons and actually minimise the risk or eliminate the defect; A specific organisational capability in making changes with senior management patronage; Measurement to check the organisation is applying the lessons and behaviours and hardware have changed in practice. We will argue that some lessons are learnt.These are notably to do with personal safety,the normal industrial risks we face at work.However,it is not clear that this is the case with process safety(or major accident events,MAEs which is the term we will use here).We will give some examples of incidents which have recurred and some cases keep recurring.It will offer some explanations of why this is the case including some of the human factors(psychological and organisational)reasons. We will then give some examples from the history of the oil and gas industry of where we have failed to learn and finally offer some possible solutions for improving our lessons learnt capability including potential legislative change.
机译:我们需要过去的旅程,使我们的未来更加友好公司表示,他们有一段经验教训作为其管理系统的一部分。否则意图是真诚的,对主要事故事件的审查表明这一点不起作用。为什么没有在这种情况下,焦虑感的焦虑意识从审查世界各地的各种主要事件的评论中,我们得出结论,所有可能的经验教训都没有从前列事件中学到。在一个意义上,未能学习是可以理解的。灾难性的事故是不常见的,很容易让人们相信,他们不会发生类似的事件。稀有性也意味着靠近主要事件的一代人并受到它的深刻影响,将在时间上举行.Trevor Kletz多年前在1993年之前认识到这个问题,“灾难的课程”或“组织如何没有记忆和事故。”(Kletz 1993)但是,是这太悲观了,我们可以做更多的风险意识组织,尽量减少对主动​​风险缓解系统的依赖已经完成,主要是在识别课程的领域,这与实际学习课程不一样,哪个更困难。我们讨论了工作的机制,导致不得与可能影响我们学习能力的各种心理特征和特征的经验教训。本文讨论了有效的经验教训的以下基本特征:要求在组织和行业外面寻求学习教训;超出识别要学习的课程的过程,但具有嵌入或内化课程的方法,实际上最小化风险或消除缺陷;具有高级管理人员的特定组织能力,以改变高级管理人员;检查组织的测量正在应用课程,行为和硬件在实践中发生了变化。我们将争辩说,一些课程是学习的。这些人尤其与个人安全有关,我们面临的正常工业风险。然而,毫无清楚,这是流程安全(或主要事故事件,MAES的主要事故事件我们将在此处使用的术语)。我们将提供重复的事件的一些例子,并且一些案例保持重复。它将提供一些解释为什么这是一个人为因素(心理和组织)原因。然后,我们将从我们未能学习的石油和天然气行业的历史上提供一些例子,最后为改善我们的经验教训能力提供了一些可能的解决方案,包括潜在的立法变革。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号