【24h】

A History of Frac-Pack Scale-Inhibitor Deployment

机译:FRAC-Pack尺度抑制作用部署的历史

获取原文

摘要

In recent years,BP has moved into reservoirs in deep water subsea projects where sea water flooding is required for reserves recovery.The introduction of sulfate rich seawater into a reservoir producing a formation brine rich in barium ions significantly increases the potential for barium sulfate scale deposition.This type of scale is not acid soluble,unlike the carbonate based scales traditionally encountered in many regions.Alkaline based chelants,such as EDTA and DTPA,are only effective at removing small accumulations.Mechanical removal is generally considered to be the only effective removal option for significant sulfate scale deposits in the tubing but is not appropriate for removing scale from within the near well bore area or within a frac-pack or screen.Thus the recommended management strategy is one of prevention rather than remediation.A combination of the low geomechanical strength of these reservoirs and other rock characteristics has led to the adoption of frac-pack completions for effective sand control.This type of completion presents a new challenge for placing scale inhibitor and managing the scale risks in frac-packed wells.BP has significant experience of preventative squeeze treatments in sea water flooded reservoirs in the UK and elsewhere.However,the majority of this experience lies with cased and perforated completions.Unlike cased and perforated wells,mechanical removal of sulphate scale from behind a frac-pack screen or within proppant filled perforations is not physically possible with mechanical methods.The damage to the rock and the gravel or screen completion elements can be permanent.If the accumulation is significant and chemical dissolution is considered impractical then,ultimately,sidetracking may be the only option to recover productivity.The cost of restoring production to a scale damaged frac-packed deep water subsea well is very significant due to the high cost of intervention and limited rig availability.In addition,as most deep water subsea projects have a relatively low well count the impact of scale formation to a particular well has a greater impact on the overall production loss.Effective prevention is therefore critical.However,industry experience in squeezing deep water ,subsea,frac-packed and multi-zoned wells is limited with uncertain treatment longevity.At the same time,subsea scale inhibitor squeezes,while shown to be effective,have a significant treatment cost.This paper describes a particular aspect of the multi faceted scale management strategy adopted by our deep water subsea projects for managing wells with frac-packed completions.It describes the inclusion of scale inhibitor within the proppant pack at the completion stage to provide protection against scale related damage during the early stages of water breakthrough.The paper highlights the testing necessary to qualify the products selected and describes initial performance data from several of our major deep water fields.
机译:近年来,BP已经进入了深水海底项目中的水库,储备储量需要海水洪水。硫酸盐富海水进入生产富含钡离子的形成盐水的储层显着增加了硫酸钡尺度沉积的可能性。这种鳞片的型号不可溶解,与传统上遇到的碳酸盐盐,在许多地区。基于碱性的螯合剂,如EDTA和DTPA,只能在消除小累积时有效。通常被认为是唯一有效的去除选项用于管道中的重要硫酸盐垢沉积物,但不适合从近井孔区域或FRAC-包装或筛网中去除尺度。这一推荐的管理策略是预防而不是修复。那个低的组合这些水库和其他岩石特性的地质力学强度导致了FRAC-Pack的采用有效的砂控制的eTions。这种类型的完成为放置规模抑制剂提供了一个新的挑战,并管理Frac-Packed Wells中的规模风险.BP在英国和其他地方的海水淹水水库中有重大的预防挤压治疗方法。但是,这些经验的大部分伴随着套管和穿孔完井。胆量的套管和穿孔孔,从FRAC-Pack屏幕或支撑剂填充的穿孔后面机械除去硫酸盐尺度,没有机械方法在物理上可能。岩石损坏和岩石损坏砾石或筛网完井元素可以是永久性的。如果积累是显着的,并且化学溶解被认为是不切实际的,那么最终,侧面可以是恢复生产力的唯一选择。恢复生产的成本恢复到尺度损坏的Frac-Packed Deep Party海底的生产成本由于干预成本和有限的装备可用性的高成本,这是非常重要的。此外,作为大多数迪P水海底项目具有相对较低的井数,规模地层对特定井的影响对整体生产损失产生了更大的影响。因此,预防性是批判性的。但是,在挤压深水,海底,弗拉克包装和挤压的行业经验。多分区井有限,寿命不确定。同时,海底抑制剂挤压,虽然显示有效,具有显着的治疗费用。本文描述了我们深层采用的多面规模管理策略的特定方面用于使用FRAC包装完成管理井的水海底项目。它描述了在完工阶段的支撑剂包内纳入量子抑制剂,以在水突破期间提供免受比例相关损伤的保护。本文突出了所需的测试选择的产品和描述了来自我们几个主要的深水领域的初始性能数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号