首页> 外文会议>International Oil Spill Conference >OIL SPILLS AND CRIMINAL SANCTIONS:AN INSURER.S PERSPECTIVE
【24h】

OIL SPILLS AND CRIMINAL SANCTIONS:AN INSURER.S PERSPECTIVE

机译:漏油和刑事制裁:保险公司的观点

获取原文

摘要

Criminal sanctions are an acceptable deterrent used to combat deliberate dumping of oil and other intentional environmental misconduct.Since insuring against intentional criminal acts is against public policy,pollution insurers have not provided coverage.The growing use of strict liability and negligence statutes by the Department of Justice(DOJ)and other law enforcement agencies,and the corresponding lower culpability level necessary for criminal liability,however,have resulted in insurance coverage being developed for certain criminal liabilities.New issues are now facing the responsible party(RP)and its insurer as a result of this increased use of criminal sanctions.When a spill occurs,the vessel operator,management,and crew need to be aware that they may be a target of a criminal investigation.They may need to assert their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.Assertion of Fifth Amendment rights,however,could hinder a cleanup response and also could be considered.lack of cooperation with responsible officials,.which could result in a breach of a vessel.s liability limits under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990(OPA 90).The cost of providing a defense also may become an issue.It may be necessary to appoint several attorneys to represent divergent vessel and crew interests.The Certificate of Financial Responsibility system under OPA 90 also may be jeopardized by the prosecution of criminal liabilities for environmental crimes by the DOJ.Under OPA 90,a guarantor/insurer has certain defenses to claims arising from a spill,including the willful misconduct of the insured.Willful misconduct established by a criminal prosecution may allow an insurer to recover from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund(OSLTF).Some of the inequities in the use of criminal sanctions against RPs eventually may be addressed by legislation.Unless there is legislation that results in major changes,however,the use of criminal sanctions must be considered by a RP and its insurer when planning oil spill response strategies and responding to a spill.This paper will examine the issues involved.
机译:刑事制裁是一种可接受的威慑,用于打击故意倾销石油和其他故意的环境不端行为。对故意犯罪行为的保险是针对公共政策的,污染保险公司尚未提供覆盖范围。司法(Doj)和其他执法机构以及刑事责任所需的相应较低的责任水平导致为某些刑事责任制定的保险范围。目前正在面临负责任的缔约国及其保险公司这一结果增加了刑事制裁的使用。当发生泄漏时,船舶运营商,管理和船员需要意识到他们可能是刑事调查的目标。他们可能需要断言他们的第五修正案对自我的权利然而,令人报入的第五修正权利的权利可能会妨碍清理答复,也可以考虑与负责任的官员合作,。可违反1990年石油污染法案(OPA 90)下的船舶责任限额。提供辩护的成本也可能成为一个问题。可能需要指定几个问题代表分歧船只和船员的兴趣。根据OPA 90,OPA 90的金融责任制度下的金融责任系统也可能受到对环境犯罪的刑事责任的危害。担保人/保险公司对来自的索赔有一定的防御泄漏,包括被保险人的故意不当行为。刑事起诉确立的威胁不当行为可能允许保险公司从石油泄漏责任信托基金(OSLTF)中恢复。有可能使用刑事制裁的不公平最终可能是通过立法致辞。无价的立法导致重大变化,然而,刑事制裁的使用必须在计划计划时审议刑事制裁G漏油泄漏响应策略和回应溢出。本文将研究所涉及的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号