首页> 外文会议>Conference on laser in surgery: Advanced characterization, therapeutics, and systems >Non thermal ureteral tissue bonding: comparison of photochemical collagen crosslinking with thermal laser bonding
【24h】

Non thermal ureteral tissue bonding: comparison of photochemical collagen crosslinking with thermal laser bonding

机译:非热输尿管组织键合:光化学胶原交联与热激光粘合的比较

获取原文

摘要

Background: Because of difficulties with suture placement during minimally invasive procedures, many have sought alternative methods of creating tissue anastomoses. Although well studied, thermal laser tissue bonding has the potential of causing collateral thermal injury. Non-thermal tissue bonding agents, which cross-link proteins when activated with light, are currently being explored. We recently reported successful non-thermal bonding using tetrabromorhodamine (TBR). The bond was stronger than sutured repairs but weaker than laser thermal bonding. We currently report our ex-vivo experience with an alternate agent, riboflavin-5-phosphate and compare these results to thermal bonding and TBR. Method: Rabbit ureteral segments were harvested, divided and placed over internal stents. End-to-end anastomoses were created using several methods: 1) Photochemical bonding: The activating light source used was an Argon laser at a radiant exposure of 90 J/cm~2. The photoalkylating agents used were TBR combined with collagen (n = 15) or riboflavin combined with fibrinogen (n = 12). 2) Thermal laser bonding: (n = 12) 50% albumin and indocyanine green solder irradiated with the Diomed diode laser (Diomed Corp) at a radiation exposure of 119.4-597 J/cm~2. 3) Sutured anastomoses: This was performed with 7-0 Dexon interrupted sutures. Control experiments using fibrinogen alone, TBR alone, riboflavin alone and collagen alone were also performed. Bond alone, TBR alone, riboflavin alone and collagen alone were also performed. Bond strength was evaluated by measuring the anastomotic leak pressure against a column of water. Results: Thermal and photochemical bonding with both TBR and riboflavin were significantly stronger than sutured repairs. The bonds created with TBR (74 ± 49 cmH_2O) were weaker than those created by thermal laser welding (132 ± 50cmH_2O) and riboflavin (115 ± 64cmH_2O). ALP measurements in the control experiments were below 10 cm H_2O. Conclusion: Photochemical bonding with riboflavin can achieve similar bond strength to thermal welding without the risk of damage to surrounding tissues. We are currently evaluating in vivo efficacy of this modality. This alternative method of tissue bonding for minimally invasive procedures should be further explored.
机译:背景:由于在微创手术期间缝合缝合放置的困难,许多人寻求创造组织吻合的替代方法。虽然研究得很好,但热激光组织键合具有引起抵抗热损伤的可能性。目前正在探索非热组织粘合剂,当用光激活时的交联蛋白。我们最近报告了使用四溴隆胺(TBR)成功的非热粘合。债券比缝线维修更强,但比激光热粘合较弱。我们目前通过替代剂,核黄素-5-磷酸盐,并将这些结果与热粘合和TBR进行比较。方法:收获兔输尿管段,分开并放置在内部支架上。使用几种方法产生端到端的吻合:1)光化学键合:使用的激活光源是90J / cm〜2的辐射暴露的氩激光。使用的光烷基化剂是TBR与胶原(n = 15)或核黄素与纤维蛋白原联合(n = 12)。 2)热激光粘合:(n = 12)用辐射暴露在119.4-597 J / cm〜2的辐射曝光时照射用二极管激光(二极管CORP)照射50%白蛋白和吲哚菁绿焊料。 3)缝合吻合:这是用7-0德克森中断缝合线进行的。还进行了单独使用纤维蛋白原,单独的核黄素和单独的胶原蛋白和胶原蛋白的对照实验。单独键合,单独的TBR,单独单独核黄素和单独的胶原蛋白。通过测量抗柱水柱的吻合泄漏压力来评估粘合强度。结果:与TBR和核黄素的热和光化学键合明显强于缝线维修。用TBR产生的键(74±49 cmH_2O)比热激光焊接(132±50cmH_2O)和核黄素(115±64cmH_2O)较弱。对照实验中的ALP测量低于10cm H_2O。结论:与核黄素的光化学键合可以达到热焊接相似的粘合强度,而不会对周围组织损坏的风险。我们目前正在评估这种方式的体内疗效。应该进一步探索这种用于微创手术的组织键合的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号