首页> 外文会议>Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition >State-preserving vs. non-state-preserving leakage control in caches
【24h】

State-preserving vs. non-state-preserving leakage control in caches

机译:缓存中的状态保留与非状态保留泄漏控制

获取原文

摘要

This paper compares the effectiveness of state-preserving and non-state-preserving techniques for leakage control in caches by comparing drowsy cache and gated-V/sub ss/ for data caches using 70nm technology parameters. To perform the comparison, we introduce "HotLeakage", a new architectural model for subthreshold and gate leakage that explicitly models the effects of temperature, voltage, and parameter variations, and has the ability to recalculate leakage currents dynamically as temperature and voltage change at runtime due to operating conditions, DVS techniques, etc. By comparing drowsy-cache and gated-V/sub ss/ at different L2 latencies and different gate oxide thickness values, we are able to identify a range of operating parameters at which gated-V/sub ss/ is more energy efficient than drowsy-cache, even though gated-V/sub ss/ does not preserve data in cache lines that have been deactivated. We are also able to show potential further benefits of gated-V/sub ss/ if an effective dynamic adaptation technique can be found. These results debunk a fairly widespread belief that state-preserving techniques are inherently superior to non-state-preserving techniques.
机译:本文通过使用70nm技术参数比较了昏昏欲睡和Gated-v / sub /用于数据缓存,比较了高速缓存中泄漏控制的状态保留和非状态保存技术的有效性。为了执行比较,我们引入了“热放”,是亚阈值和栅极泄漏的新架构模型,明确地模拟了温度,电压和参数变化的影响,并且能够在运行时动态地重新计算泄漏电流。由于操作条件,DVS技术等。通过比较Drowsy-Cache和Gated-V / Subs /在不同的L2延迟和不同的栅极氧化物厚度值,我们能够识别Gated-V /的一系列操作参数SUS /更节能比Drowsy-Cache更能节能,即使Gated-V / Sub SS /不保留已停用的缓存行中的数据。如果可以找到有效的动态适配技术,我们还能够显示Gated-V / Sub SS的潜在进一步的好处。这些结果揭示了一种相当普遍的信念,即状态保存技术本质上优于不良的不良技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号