首页> 外文会议>1st workshop on modules and libraries for proof assistants 2009 >State-Preserving vs. Non-State-Preserving Leakage Control in Caches
【24h】

State-Preserving vs. Non-State-Preserving Leakage Control in Caches

机译:缓存中的状态保留与非状态泄漏控制

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper compares the effectiveness of state-preserving and non-state-preserving techniques for leakage control in caches by comparing drowsy cache and gated-Vss for data caches using 70nm technology parameters. To perform the comparison, we introduce "HotLeakage", a new architectural model for subthreshold and gate leakage that explicitly models the effects of temperature, voltage, and parameter variations, and has the ability to recalculate leakage currents dynamically as temperature and voltage change at runtime due to operating conditions, DVS techniques, etc.By comparing drowsy-cache and gated-Vss at different L2 latencies and different gate oxide thickness values, we are able to identify a range of operating parameters at which gated-Vss is more energy efficient than drowsy-cache, even though gated-Vss does not preserve data in cache lines that have been deactivated. We are also able to show potential further benefits of gated-Vss if an effective dynamic adaptation technique can be found.These results debunk a fairly widespread beliefthat state-preserving techniques are inherently superior to non-state-preserving techniques.
机译:本文通过比较使用70nm技术参数的睡缓存和门控Vss数据缓存,比较了状态保存和非状态保存技术对缓存中泄漏控制的有效性。为了进行比较,我们引入了“ HotLeakage”,这是一个用于亚阈值和栅极泄漏的新架构模型,该模型可以显式地模拟温度,电压和参数变化的影响,并且能够在运行时随温度和电压的变化动态重新计算泄漏电流由于工作条件,DVS技术等因素的影响,通过比较不同L2时延和不同栅极氧化层厚度值下的昏昏欲睡缓存和门控Vss,我们能够确定门控Vss较之能效更高的一系列工作参数睡意缓存,即使gated-Vss不会在已停用的缓存行中保留数据。如果能够找到有效的动态自适应技术,我们还能够证明门控Vss的潜在进一步好处。这些结果揭穿了一个相当广泛的信念,即状态保留技术本质上优于非状态保留技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号