首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Material Engineering and Application >Shear Bond Strength and ARI Score of Chemically Cured Orthodontic Adhesive Resins
【24h】

Shear Bond Strength and ARI Score of Chemically Cured Orthodontic Adhesive Resins

机译:化学固化正畸粘合树脂的剪切粘合强度和ARI评分

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare shear bond strength and to evaluate Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) score among three chemically cured orthodontic adhesive resins, namely Unite (3M Unitek, USA), Rely-a-Bond (Reliance, USA) and Ortho-Force (China). Materials and methods: Ninety extracted human maxillary premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups (30 teeth/group). Upper premolar metal brackets (Ormco, USA) were boned by using the following adhesive systems: Unite, Rely-a-Bond and Ortho-Force. After 24 hours, shear bond strength was tested by using a Universal Testing Machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. After debonding, all teeth and brackets were examined under 10-times magnification and scored by using Image-Pro Plus 7.0 software program. Results: One-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey HSD multiple comparison test showed a statistically significant (P<0.05) difference among groups. Ortho-Force had the lowest shear bond strength (17.53±3.60 MPa) and demonstrated statistically significant difference (P<0.05) from the other groups. The difference between Unite (22.40±3.11 MPa) and Rely-a-Bond (20.67±2.70 MPa) was not statistically significant. The bond failure sites were categorized according to the ARI, and the Chi-square test showed significant differences in the ARI scores (P<0.05) among all sample groups. The ARI score of 3 was found to be the most prevalent in Ortho-force (73.33%), followed by Unite (66.67%), and Rely-a-Bond (0%). In Rely-a-Bond group, ARI score of 1 was the most prevalent (66.67%). Only Unite had no residual adhesive left on tooth surface after debonding (6.67%). Conclusions: Unite and Rely-a-Bond produced greater shear bond strength than Ortho-Force. According to ARI score, Unite and Ortho-Force had a high frequency of all the adhesive remained on the tooth surface but Rely-a-Bond had high frequency of less than half the adhesive remained on the tooth surface.
机译:本研究的目的是比较剪切粘合强度并评估三种化学固化的正畸粘合剂树脂中的粘合剂残余指数(ARI)得分,即团结(3M Unitek,USA),依赖A-Bond(Reliance,USA)和Ortho --Force(中国)。材料和方法:用九十提取的人上颌前磨牙被随机分为3组(30颗牙/组)。通过使用以下粘合剂系统(Ormco,USA),上述磨牙金属支架(Ormco,USA):联合,依赖互补和正交。 24小时后,通过使用十字头速度为0.5mm / min的通用试验机测试剪切粘合强度。在剥离后,通过使用Image-Pro加上7.0软件程序进行10倍的放大率和评分后检查所有牙齿和括号。结果:单向ANOVA,后面是HOC Tukey HSD多重比较试验显示组之间的统计学意义(P <0.05)差异。矫正力具有最低的剪切粘合强度(17.53±3.60mPa),并从其他组中显示出统计学上有显着差异(P <0.05)。联合(22.40±3.11MPa)和依赖-A键(20.67±2.70MPa)之间的差异没有统计学意义。根据ARI对键失效部位进行分类,并且Chi-Square测试在所有样品组中显示出ARI分数的显着差异(P <0.05)。发现3的ARI得分是最普遍的正交力(73.33%),其次是联合(66.67%),依赖于-A-键(0%)。在依赖A债券组中,ARI评分为1是最普遍的(66.67%)。在脱粘后,牙齿表面上才没有留下残留粘合剂(6.67%)。结论:联合和依赖 - A键产生的剪切粘合强度大于正向力。根据ARI得分,Unite和Ortho-Force的所有粘合剂的高频率保持在牙齿表面上,但依靠-A键的高频率低于牙齿表面上的粘合剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号