...
首页> 外文期刊>Angle Orthodontist >A comparison of shear bond strengths of three visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives.
【24h】

A comparison of shear bond strengths of three visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives.

机译:三种可见光固化正畸粘合剂的剪切粘结强度比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength and the site of bond failure for 2 visible light-cured composites (Transbond XT and Enlight) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC; Fuji Ortho LC). Seventy-five extracted human premolars were collected and randomly divided into 3 test groups. Brackets were bonded to the teeth in each test group with the respective adhesive according to the manufacturers' instructions. Each specimen was debonded using an Instron Universal Testing Machine at a crosshead speed of 0.1 mm/min. The mode of bond failure was observed by using light microscopy. The results of this study demonstrated that the light-cured composites had a higher shear bond strength than the RMGIC. The adhesive-remnant scores were similar for the composites with the mean values at about 2, which indicates that more than half of the adhesive remained on the tooth. The RMGIC had a mean score of 3, which was significantly different from the composites and indicated that all of the adhesive remained on the tooth with a distinct impression of the bracket.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估两种可见光固化复合材料(Transbond XT和Enlight)和树脂改性的玻璃离聚物水泥(RMGIC; Fuji Ortho LC)的剪切粘结强度和粘结破坏部位。收集了75个提取的人类前磨牙,并将其随机分为3个测试组。根据制造商的说明,用各自的粘合剂将托槽粘结到每个测试组的牙齿上。使用Instron万能测试机以0.1 mm / min的十字头速度剥离每个样品。通过使用光学显微镜观察键合失败的模式。这项研究的结果表明,光固化的复合材料比RMGIC具有更高的剪切粘结强度。复合材料的残余胶粘剂分数相似,平均值约为2,这表明超过一半的粘胶残留在牙齿上。 RMGIC的平均得分为3,与复合材料的得分明显不同,表明所有粘合剂均保留在牙齿上,并带有明显的托槽印象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号