首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1741) THE COMPARISON OF KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF STUDENTS OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY STUDIES WITH RESPECT TO PRACTICE BASED ON SCIENTIFIC FACTS
【24h】

(1741) THE COMPARISON OF KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF STUDENTS OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY STUDIES WITH RESPECT TO PRACTICE BASED ON SCIENTIFIC FACTS

机译:(1741)基于科学事实的培养研究和助产研究的知识与态度的比较

获取原文

摘要

In order to ensure safe midwifery care satisfying the highest standards it is necessary to raiseawareness of health professionals' about the need to use the latest research results in their dailypractice. The dissemination of research findings conducted by nurses and midwives in the field of theirspecialization and the development of the profession, knowledge and practice based on scientific factscan help to increase the level and effectiveness of provided health services. Thus it is extremelyimportant to expand students' of nursing and midwifery knowledge and to improve the competenciesrelated to methodology of research and critical analysis of scientific literature.AimThe aim of the study was to compare the knowledge and attitudes of midwifery and nursing studentswith respect to Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) and Evidence-Based Practice (EBP).Material and Method243 student's of Master's studies in Medical University of Warsaw, including 116 students of midwifery(group MS, 1 male) and 127 students of nursing (group NS, 4 male), 68% full-time students, 54% hastaken up work in nursing or midwifery. The mean age of the population studied 26.46 years (min. 22,max. 51, SD = 7,06). Voluntary, anonymous survey, standardized Evidence-Based Practicequestionnaire from University of South Australia, quantitative analysis of research findings. Statisticalanalysis, non-parametric U Mann-Whitney and chi2 tests: STATISTICA version 10.0.ResultsOver 30% of students of both groups: NS and MS have never met with the discussed subject of EBP.Significantly more NS does not know the meaning of the term EBP (43%) in contrast to MS (18%).More students from MS group intends to use the relevant scientific literature in order to update theirknowledge (75%) and improve the skills necessary to integrate EBP into their professional practice(66%) than students from NS group (respectively 53.5% and 52%). Only for 12.5% NS scientificreports are useful in their professional practice in comparison to 35% MS. In the group of NS thereading of published research results each day reading declared only 1.5% of students in contrast to agroup of MS where the percentage was much higher (10.5%). A comparable number of students ofgroups MS and NS have never assessed the methodological correctness of the used scientificliterature (respectively 40% and 35%) and did not refer the results of research to self-diagnosis (32%and 33%). Only three students from the group NS declared the knowledge and ability to explain theterm ,,statistical significance” (2.5%) in comparison to MS group where the possession of thiscompetency declared 21 students (18%).Conclusions1. In the group of students of nursing (NS) and midwifery (MS) the level of knowledge andattitudes with respect to Evidence - Based Practice were different depending on the field ofstudy.2. In order to improve the knowledge of nurses and midwives with respect to the use of EBP ineveryday clinical work it is advisable to provide them additional training and to expand theirskills in the area of methodology of scientific research.3. The educational programs as part of nursing and midwifery studies should be supplemented bythe content related to Evidence-based Practice in order to expand students' knowledge aboutthe benefits resulting from using the latest research findings in their future professional practice.
机译:为了确保安全的助产照顾满足最高标准,是卫生专业人员的raiseaware“关于使用最新研究的需要在他们的日常规外的前提下。在他们的专业化领域和基于科学事实上的专业,知识和实践的发展领域的护士和助产士进行的调查结果传播,从而提高提供卫生服务的水平和有效性。因此,扩大学生的护理和助产人员知识并改善对科学文献的研究和批判性分析的竞争力,这是非常重要的。该研究的目的是比较助产和护理学生的知识和态度 - 尊重证据 - 基于医学(EBM)和基于证据的实践(EBP)。材料和方法243学生在华沙医科大学硕士学位,其中包括116名助产学生(集团MS,1名男性)和127名护理学生(NS,4次男性),68%的全日制学生,54%在护理或助产方面搭配工作。人口的平均年龄研究26.46年(最小22,最大51,SD = 7,06)。南澳大利亚大学的自愿,匿名调查,基于标准的循证惯例,对研究结果的定量分析。统计分析,非参数u Mann-whitney和Chi2测试:Statistica版本10.0.ResultOver两个群体的学生:NS和MS从未见过讨论的EBP主题。更多NS不知道该术语的含义与MS相比(18%)的EBP(43%)。来自MS组的更多学生打算使用相关的科学文学,以更新他们的知识(75%)并提高将EBP融入专业惯例所需的技能(66% )与NS组的学生(分别为53.5%和52%)。只有12.5%的NS ScientificReport在他们的专业实践中有用,比较35%MS。在公布的研究结果中,每天阅读只有1.5%的学生与MS的百分比较高(10.5%)。比较数量的组合MS和NS的学生从未评估过使用的SCHINEIFICLITILITATURITICS的方法论正确性(分别为40%和35%),并且没有将研究结果转到自我诊断(32%和33%)。只有三名来自NS的学生宣布了与MS集团相比,宣布统计学的知识和能力解释,统计意义(2.5%),其中拥有本率为21名学生(18%)。结论1。在哺乳(NS)和助产士(MS)的学生中,关于基于证据的实践的知识水平取决于斯特鲁迪的领域。为了改善护士和助产士的知识,在无用的EBP使用EBP临床工作,建议在科学研究方法中提供额外的培训并扩大他们的基金。作为护理和助产研究的一部分的教育计划应由与基于证据的实践相关的内容来补充,以扩大学生对未来专业实践中最新研究结果产生的益处的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号