首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1440) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATORS' PROFESSIONAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND THEIR ATTITUDES TOWARD GIFTED EDUCATION
【24h】

(1440) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATORS' PROFESSIONAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND THEIR ATTITUDES TOWARD GIFTED EDUCATION

机译:(1440)教育工作者专业与人口特征的关系及其对天赋教育的态度

获取原文

摘要

The study investigated the relationship between educators' demographic and professionalcharacteristics and their attitudes toward gifted education. The variables examined in relation toattitudes toward gifted education were gender, highest educational degree earned, capacity in whichthe educator serves (teacher, guidance counselor, administrator, etc.), the grade span within whichthe educator serves (preschool, grades 1 through 3, etc.), type of school employed (public or private),years of experience as an educator, years of experience as an educator in small locations like villagesor towns, and years of experience as an educator in locations larger than towns. Data were collectedfrom 421 educators of preschool through university who were employed in various schools oreducational institutions in Istanbul, Turkey during the 2011-2012 school year. The Educators' Attitudestoward Gifted Education Scale, which was originally developed by the authors, was used to collectdata on the attitudes. The scale included 15 items, which were on a five-point Likert scale, rangingfrom 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree'. The scale, shown to be valid and reliable in a journal articlealready published, measured the following four factors: 1) Degree to which educators perceived giftedstudents as a national treasure 2) Degree to which educators perceived gifted education as an elitistpractice 3) Degree to which educators believed that gifted students had different academic needs, and4) Degree to which educators believed that gifted students had different social/emotionalcharacteristics and needs. Each factor was measured as the average of scores from the itemsmeasuring that factor. To examine the aforementioned relationships, independent samples t-test,paired-samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, or correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient)was used. One finding was that the educators believed more in gifted students' differential academicneeds than in their differential social/emotional needs. Another interesting finding was public schooleducators' more positive attitudes toward gifted students and gifted education than those of privateschool educators. The level of their perception of gifted students as a national treasure was higher,and the level of their perception of gifted education as an elitist practice was lower. A third finding wasthat male educators' perception of gifted students as a national treasure was higher than that offemale educators. Further exploration of this finding revealed that administrators' perception of giftedstudents as a national treasure was higher than that of elementary school homeroom teachers(although not statistically significant). The two statements above were found to be interesting in light ofthe fact that 17 out of 20 administrators in the study were male, while 95 out of 138 homeroomteachers were female. All of the findings above were interpreted within the global context as well aswithin the context of education in today's Istanbul. Recommendations were also made about teacherpreparation and in-service teacher training as they are related to educators' attitudes toward giftedstudents and gifted education.
机译:该研究调查了教育者人口统计和专业性与其对天赋教育的态度之间的关系。在有关教育的关系中审查的变量是性别,最高的教育学位,教育者服务的能力(教师,指导顾问,管理员等),教育家服务的年级跨度(幼儿园,1至3年级,等级1到3等级。),学校类型(公共或私人或私人),多年的经验,作为村庄城镇等小地点的教育家的多年经验,以及大于城镇的地点的教育家的多年经验。通过在2011-2012学年的土耳其伊斯坦布尔的各种学校或教育机构中受雇的大学的421名教育工作者收集了数据。教育工作者最初由作者开发的教育教育规模用于收集态度。规模包括15个项目,这是一个五点李克特量表,从“非常不同意”到“非常同意”。在ArticlealReady公布的杂志上,衡量了以下四个因素的规模,衡量了以下四个因素:1)教育工作者认为辉煌的辉煌是国家宝贝2)学位,教育者认为有天赋的教育作为ElitistPraTice 3)学位教育工作者认为,有天赋的学生有不同的学术需求,4)学位教育者认为有天赋的学生具有不同的社会/情感特征和需求。每个因素都被测量为从项目释放的分数的平均值。为了检查上述关系,使用独立样品T检验,配对样本T检验,方差的单向分析或相关性(Pearson相关系数)。一个发现是,教育工作者相信有天赋的学生差异学术,而不是他们的差异社会/情感需求。另一个有趣的发现是公共学校教育者对有天赋的学生和私人教育的更积极态度,而不是私人学校教育者。他们对全国宝藏的天赋学生的看法程度更高,而他们对精英主义实践的天赋教育的看法程度较低。第三个发现是男性教育工作者对全国宝藏的有天赋的学生的看法高于离交的教育者。对这一发现的进一步探讨透露,管理员对全国宝藏的辉煌看法的看法高于小学特主教师(虽然没有统计学意义)。发现上述两项陈述是有趣的,即在研究中的20名管理员中有17名是男性的,而138名Homeroomteachers的95名是女性。上面的所有调查结果都在全球范围内解释为在当今伊斯坦布尔的教育范围内。建议也是关于守护者的制备和在职教师培训,因为它们与教育工作者对辉煌的态度和天赋教育有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号