首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(347) DEVELOPMENT-ORIENTED TESTING MODEL: CASE STUDY OF THE WEST AFRICAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL AND CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS
【24h】

(347) DEVELOPMENT-ORIENTED TESTING MODEL: CASE STUDY OF THE WEST AFRICAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL AND CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS

机译:(347)以发展为导向的测试模式:对西非考试理事会和剑桥学校证书考试的案例研究

获取原文

摘要

What is not inspected should not be expected. This proven statement succinctly captures the essenceand significance of examinations. All over the world, Students and Teachers literally dance to thebeats of examinations, especially examinations linked with certification. It is therefore not uncommonto find Teachers and Students concentrating more on topics and activities being assessed andneglecting topics and practical works that are consistently not being assessed by examining bodies.Consequently, examination/certification bodies wield great powers that could be harnessed to catalyzepositive development. It is against this background that the Development Oriented Testing [DOT]model was conceived. The questions, however, are: do the examination bodies realize the enormity ofthe power they have? If they do, to what extent are they pragmatically using this power to catalyzeproductivity and development in their domain of control? This paper hypothesized that in manyAfrican/developing nations, unlike in developed countries, the external examination/certification bodiesbarely assess true practical work and applied knowledge. The paper further postulates that this trendcould be the bane of low productivity/development in these countries. The case study and ex postfacto research designs were adopted in this study. To test these hypotheses, comparative analysis ofpast West African Examination Council [WAEC]-West African Secondary School CertificateExamination [WASSCE] and Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Examination[IGCSE] was conducted. The goal of the content analysis of past questions was to identify questionsthat tend to mobilize secondary school Teachers/Students to apply knowledge gained in the course ofstudy to evolve useful products and services. The outcome of the content analysis revealed that thereare remarkable differences in the number of higher educational objectives examined in Cambridgeand WAEC O-level examinations. Cambridge examinations furnished more application questions thanWAEC examinations. A quick survey of Teachers and Students on this issue further corroborated thepostulations. The submission of this research, based on the inference made from this finding, is thatthis negative trend must be reversed [particularly at the secondary and tertiary levels] for African andrelated developing nations to experience pragmatic indigenous productivity/development. It istherefore recommended that the Development Oriented Testing [DOT] Model should be adopted toredress this situation.
机译:不应该预期未被检查的内容。这一验证的声明简洁地捕捉了考试的潜在意义。世界各地,学生和教师对考试的跳舞,特别是与认证相关的考试。因此,它并不是毫无疑问的教师和学生,专注于正在评估的主题和活动以及通过检查机构一直没有评估的主题和实践作品.Consequally,考试/认证机构挥杆可以利用催化剂开发的大国。在这个背景下,构思了面向发展的测试[DOT]模型。然而,问题是:检查机构是否意识到他们所拥有的力量?如果他们这样做,他们在多大程度上使用这种权力在多大程度上利用这种权力来催化并在其控制领域中的催化和发育?本文假设在许多非洲/发展中国家,与发达国家不同,外部检查/认证机构对真正的实际工作和应用知识评估。本文进一步假设这一趋势是这些国家的低生产率/开发的祸害。本研究采用了案例研究和前后物品研究设计。为了测试这些假设,对比分析西非考试委员会[WAEC] -West非洲中学证书审查[WASSCE]和剑桥国际审查国际一般证明书[IIGCSE]。过去问题内容分析的目标是识别调查题,倾向于调动中学教师/学生在学生的课程中申请知识,以发展有用的产品和服务。内容分析的结果表明,在剑突型Webec O级检查中检测的高等教育目标数量显着差异。剑桥考试提供了更多的申请问题,ThisWaec考试。对师生的快速调查,对此问题进一步证实了这一问题。基于这一发现的推论,提交本研究,即负面趋势必须逆转[特别是在二级和三级层面],以为非洲胸部和三级和三级层面进行了解,以体验务实的土着生产力/发展。因此建议采用这一情况的发展导向测试[DOT]模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号