首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1331) OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES (OER): WHAT ARE THEY? WHERE ARE THEY? AND WHAT WILL THEY MEAN TO THE SCHOOLS SECTOR?
【24h】

(1331) OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES (OER): WHAT ARE THEY? WHERE ARE THEY? AND WHAT WILL THEY MEAN TO THE SCHOOLS SECTOR?

机译:(1331)开放教育资源(oer):他们是什么?他们在哪里?他们对学校部门的意义是什么?

获取原文

摘要

In June 2012 UNESCO published its "OER Declaration" - a ten-point manifesto designed to promoteOpen Educational Resources (OER) globally. In September 2013 the European Commission launchedits "Opening Up Education" strategy - a central theme of its three strand strategy is "Increased use ofOpen Educational Resources (OER), ensuring that educational materials produced with public fundingare available to all". Sovereign nations across the world have stated their support for OER and somesuch as the US have committed significant public funds (in January 2011 the US Governmentannounced a $2bn investment for OER creation in the community college sector).There are 84 OER policies currently (as of December 2013) listed in the global Creative CommonsOER Policy Registry. However, only 15 relate to EU member states. More than half of the policyregistry concerns US polices. These are of particular interest and relevance since a significantproportion relate to K-12 education whereas, by comparison with the Higher Education sector, thereare relatively few OER policies concerning schools in Europe.Across Europe there has been increased interest in, and discussion of, OER. However, this wouldappear to be much more common at Higher Education level than at school level, and among ELearningresearchers and a small number of “activists”.As yet, it appears that OER have failed to capture the imagination of practitioners in the compulsoryschooling sector in Europe.Is this really the case? If so why? How does Europe compare with North America and the rest of theworld? How do countries compare? Are OER viewed as a Higher Education phenomenon? What hasbeen the impact of the MOOC hype?Crucially, why is there so much confusion concerning the amount of OER accessible to schools?Even the European Commission appears to be uncertain: Its own experts can state on the one handthat “... there may be some complacency arising from a belief that an abundance of digital resourcesalready exist” whilst the same paper quotes research which asserts that the “Abundance of resources... challenges us to review our role as educators”.This presentation (and paper) will draw from the author's research for the European Commission andhis subsequent “Policy Recommendations (For Schools)” to the Commission to look at the history of(digital) OER in the K-12 sector. It will cite case studies from Europe, North America and globally(including the European Commission's Open Discovery Space and rival commercial offerings) toexplore the challenges and opportunities, the competing philosophies, the potential friction between"free" and “commercial” OER and the inadequacies of the current research base.
机译:2012年6月,联合国教科文组织发布了“OER宣言” - 一个十分宣言,旨在在全球范围内推广教育资源(OER)。 2013年9月,欧盟委员会发动机“开放教育”战略 - 其三个股线策略的中心主题是“增加了开放教育资源(OER)的使用,确保为所有人提供的公共汇总生产教育材料”。世界各地的主权国家已经向伊尔和某些人提供了支持,因为美国致力于大量的公共资金(2011年1月美国政府在社区大学部门对OER创建的2亿美元的投资)目前是84个OER政策(如2013年12月)在全球创意认可政策登记处上市。但是,只有15次涉及欧盟成员国。超过一半的政策涉及美国政策。这些特别令人兴趣和相关性,因为重要的是与K-12教育有关,而与高等教育部门相比,欧洲有关学校的奥尔政策相对较少。欧洲有兴趣和讨论,欧尔。然而,这种幸福在高等教育水平比在学校级别和少数“活动家”中更常见。然而,众议院似乎未能捕捉到强制性学院的从业者的想象力欧洲。真的是这种情况吗?如果是这样的话?欧洲如何与北美和其余的世界相比?国家如何比较? OER被视为高等教育现象吗? MooC炒作的影响是什么?为什么会有关于学校可访问的oer数量的混淆?即使是欧洲委员会似乎不确定:它自己的专家可以在一个手上说明“......可能是一项信念所产生的一些自满,即积累的数字资源已经存在“同样的纸张引用研究,这声明了”丰富的资源......挑战我们审查我们作为教育工作者的角色“。这篇文稿(和纸张)将绘制从提交人的欧洲委员会的研究,随后的“政策建议(为学校)”向委员会看看K-12部门(数字)伊尔河中的历史。它将引用欧洲,北美和全球范围内的案例研究(包括欧盟委员会的开放式发现空间和竞争对手商业产品),以探索挑战和机遇,竞争哲学,“自由”与“商业”OER与不足之间的潜在摩擦目前的研究基地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号