首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on New Methods of Damage and Failure Analysis of Structural Parts >Stress Distribution in Front of the Crack - Analytical Solutions vs. Numerical. Can the Differences be Minimized?
【24h】

Stress Distribution in Front of the Crack - Analytical Solutions vs. Numerical. Can the Differences be Minimized?

机译:裂纹 - 分析解决方案前方的应力分布与数值。差异可以最小化吗?

获取原文

摘要

It is shown that it is possible to obtain such material parameters as a and Q, which, when used in the analytical formulae proposed by Hutchinson, Rice and Rosengren and O'Dowd and Shih, can lead to stress distributions similar to those obtained numerically (except for the region at the immediate crack front). The numerical solution obtained after calibration of the stress-strain uniaxial curve and assuming large strains is expected to be close to the ""real" stress distribution. Thus, the analytical solution is also close to the "real" stress distribution. These new values of a and Q can now be used in fracture criteria proposed within the scope of classical nonlinear fracture mechanics.
机译:结果表明,可以获得如A和Q的这种材料参数,当在Hutchinson,RiceN和Rosengren和O'Dowd和Shih所提出的分析公式中使用时,可以导致与数值获得的那些相似的应力分布(除了立即裂缝前的区域)。在应力 - 应变单轴曲线校准并假设大菌株校准后获得的数值溶液接近“真实”应力分布。因此,分析解决方案也接近“真实”应力分布。这些新值A和Q现在可以用于古典非线性裂缝力学范围内提出的裂缝标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号