首页> 外文会议>Educational Science International Conference >Student Learning Outcome Difference on Salt Hydrolysis Between Student Taught Using STAD Model and Student Taught Using TAI model
【24h】

Student Learning Outcome Difference on Salt Hydrolysis Between Student Taught Using STAD Model and Student Taught Using TAI model

机译:使用TAI模型教学学生盐水解的学生学习结果差异

获取原文

摘要

This research aimed to know difference between students learning outcome taught using STAD model and students learning outcome taught using TAI model on the subject of salt hydrolysis. This research was conducted at SMA N 2 Majenne, Indonesia. This research was categorized as quasi-experimental with post-test only control design. Population in this research was three groups of 11th grade student of natural science consist of 60 students. Samples were a group student namely XI MIA 1 (1st experimental group, taught using TAI type cooperative learning model) and a group students namely XI MIA 3 (2nd experimental group, taught using STAD type cooperative learning model). They were taken by random sampling. Each group consisted of 20 students. Data was collected by administering a posttest, a multiple choice test, consisted of 20 valid items. The data obtained was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The result of the descriptive analysis showed the average score of the 1st experimental group posttest was 84.1 ± 8.5 and the 2nd experimental group was 76 ± 13.08. The percentages of completeness were 80% and 35% for the first and second experimental group, respectively. Data was not distributed normally and not homogeneous. The results showed that the learning outcome of students taught using the TAI type cooperative learning model was better than the learning outcome of students taught using the STAD type cooperative learning model.
机译:这项研究旨在了解使用Stad模型教学的学生学习成果的差异和学生使用TAI模型在盐水解的主题上学习了学习结果。这项研究是在印度尼西亚的SMA N 2 Majenne进行的。该研究被归类为拟实验,只有测试后的控制设计。本研究中的人口是三群11年级的自然科学,包括60名学生。样品是一名群体学生,即Xi MIA 1(第一个实验组,使用Tai型合作学习模式教授)和一群学生,即Xi Mia 3(第2组使用Stad型合作学习模型教授)。它们是由随机抽样采取的。每组由20名学生组成。通过管理PostTest,多项选择测试来收集数据,包括20个有效项。使用描述性和推动统计分析所获得的数据。描述性分析的结果表明,第一个实验组PostTest的平均得分为84.1±8.5,第二实验组为76±13.08。分别为第一和第二实验组的完整性百分比为80%和35%。数据没有正常分布而不是均匀的。结果表明,使用泰型合作学习模型教授的学生的学习结果优于使用Stad型合作学习模型教学的学习结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号