Sustainable transport planning requires an integrated a pproach involving strategic planning, impact analysis and multi-criteria evaluation. This study aims at relaxing the utility-based decision-making assumption by newly embedding anticipated-regret and combined utility-regret decision mechanisms in an integrated transport planning framework. The framework consists of a two-round Delphi survey, an integrated land-use and transport model for Madrid, and multi-criteria analysis. Results show that (i) regret based ranking has similar mean but larger variance than utility-based ranking, (ii) the least-regret scenario forms a compromise between the desired and the expected scenarios, (iii) the least-regret scenario can lead to higher user benefits in the short-term and lower user benefits in the long-term, (iv) utility-based, regret-based and combined utility-regret based multi-criteria analysis result in different rankings of policy packages, and (v) the combined utility-regret ranking is more informative compared with utility-based or regret13 based ranking.
展开▼
