首页> 外文会议>IAEE International Conference >COMPARATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT OF NATURAL GAS UTILIZATION PROJECTS UNDER PETROLEUM PROFIT ACT AND PETROLEUM INDUSTRY BILL 2018(PPT)
【24h】

COMPARATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT OF NATURAL GAS UTILIZATION PROJECTS UNDER PETROLEUM PROFIT ACT AND PETROLEUM INDUSTRY BILL 2018(PPT)

机译:2018年石油利润法和石油工业法案下天然气利用项目的比较风险评估(PPT)

获取原文

摘要

INTRODUCTION-OVERVIEW OF STUDY(1): 1.Long standing policy intent to excise the Associated Gas Framework Agreement(AGFA)found in Nigerian Petroleum Profit Tax Act(PPTA).2.AGFA stipulates that costs incurred in the development of gas utilization projects will be recovered against oil income.3.Policy makers have argued that AGFA encourages excess gas project spend,erodes the tax base,delays government take and acts as an avenue for investors to shift profits.4.The proposed PIFB 2018 sets out to repeal AGFA;Hence a comparison of PPT vs PIFB2018 is explored.5.Imperative for this paper is driven by: 6.Need to Assess the risk impact on gas investment by the repeal of AGFA.7.Potential impact on upstream projects upon repeal of AGFA.8.This study will address the following questions: 9.What risk is a gas utilization project exposed to by the excise of AGFA.10.What changes in government take by the proposed policy change.11.How does the risk profile of an upstream oil investment shift due to the proposal.
机译:简介 - 概述的研究(1):1.Long一贯政策意图切除伴生气框架协议(AGFA)在尼日利亚的石油利润税法案发现(PPTA).2.AGFA规定,在天然气利用项目的开发产生的费用将防油income.3.Policy厂商回收人认为,AGFA鼓励多余气体项目支出,侵蚀了税基,政府延迟起飞并作为一个渠道,为投资者转向profits.4.The提出PIFB 2018下决心废除AGFA;因此,一个PPT VS PIFB2018的比较是explored.5.Imperative该纸被驱动:在6.Need AGFA的废除,以评估对上游项目AGFA.7.Potential冲击废除上气投资风险冲击.8.This研究将解决以下问题:9.什么是风险所提出的政策change.11.How由政府采取AGFA.10.What变化的消费暴露在瓦斯利用项目做的风险状况上游石油投资移由于提议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号