首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society >The assessment of traffic livability, including local effects at home, during trips and at the destination, based on the individual activity pattern and trip behaviour
【24h】

The assessment of traffic livability, including local effects at home, during trips and at the destination, based on the individual activity pattern and trip behaviour

机译:基于个人活动模式和旅行行为,在家庭,在旅行期间和目的地的地方效应,包括当地效应

获取原文

摘要

The environmental quality of the living environment is mainly linked to the direct and indirect impact of traffic in the neighborhood of the dwellings. In the Flemish mobility and urban planning, the term 'livability' is used focusing on the living conditions of people's home location: what is the satisfaction about their living environment? The more specific term 'traffic livability' is used to describe the impact of all types of traffic on the livability of a dwelling location. Some methodologies were developed for an objective measurement of the traffic impact on quality of life. In Flanders the most commonly used methodologies are the 'traffic livability index' 1 and the 'bearing capacity'2, which use a very narrow interpretation of the traffic livability, as they are highly based on the local road design (number of lanes, cycle path, ...) and the local traffic characteristics (traffic flow, speed, traffic safety, ...) of the street of the dwelling. The main critic is that these methods should measure over the complete living environment of a person, rather than just at the dwelling. For this reason, an alternative methodology was developed for an objective measurement of the impact of traffic on the local quality of the living environment. Compared to the current practice, this new methodology aims at the following objectives: 1. The evaluation is not done for the average person, but includes individual needs and travel patterns, based on personal characteristics, representing the large diversity of the mobility needs. 2. The methodology should reflect a daily activity pattern, including the traveled routes and destinations. The traffic livability of a specific household in a specific area will reflect the full extent of their needs at home, during the trips and at the destinations. 3. Traffic livability is measured by means of a broad set of indicators, representing different types of traffic impacts (accessibility, traffic noise, traffic emissions, ...). The separate indicators are combined into an evaluation of the traffic livability, including an extensive set of secondary effects. This is mainly realized by a better simulation of the personal trip behavior, using the data from the Flemish Trip Behavor Survey. In order to evaluate the livability at a certain home location (a number of) households are sampled from this database, with the specific characteristics of the household (composition, car availability, children, ...), the people in the household (age, employment, ...) and their activities and trip pattern. With this information, the different indicators for traffic livability can be evaluated on the home location, as well as during the trip and at the destination.
机译:生活环境的环境质量主要与住宅附近的交通直接和间接影响有关。在佛兰芒流动和城市规划中,术语“居民”侧重于人民家庭地点的生活条件:对他们的生活环境有什么满足感?更具体的术语“交通居住能力”用于描述所有类型的交通对住宅位置的居住地的影响。一些方法是为客观测量的对生活质量的客观影响而开发的。在法兰范中,最常用的方法是“交通宜家索引”1和“承载力”,它使用非常狭隘的交通竞争性解释,因为它们高度基于当地道路设计(车道数量,周期)路径,......)和住宅街道的当地交通特征(交通流量,速度,交通安全,......)。主要评论家是这些方法应该衡量一个人的完整生活环境,而不是在住宅。因此,开发了一种替代方法,用于客观测量交通对生活环境的当地质量的影响。与目前的做法相比,这种新方法旨在实现以下目的:1。评估不是为普通人提供的,但包括基于个人特征的个人需求和旅行模式,代表移动性需求的大量多样性。 2.方法论应反映日常活动模式,包括旅行的路线和目的地。特定地区特定家庭的交通居民将在旅行期间和目的地期间在家里的需求方面反映他们的需求。 3.通过广泛的指标来测量交通驻地,代表不同类型的交通影响(可访问性,交通噪声,交通排放,......)。单独的指标组合成对交通竞争性的评估,包括广泛的二次效果。这主要通过佛兰芒行程运动调查的数据更好地模拟个人旅行行为。为了评估某个家庭位置(多个)家庭的居住能力从该数据库中取样,具有家庭(组成,汽车可用性,儿童,......)的具体特征,家庭中的人员(年龄,就业,......)及其活动和旅行模式。在此信息中,可以在归属位置以及旅行期间和目的地的不同指标进行交通驻地的不同指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号