首页> 外文会议>Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center Symposium >Integration of Data Rectification in Incipient Process Fault Diagnosis
【24h】

Integration of Data Rectification in Incipient Process Fault Diagnosis

机译:初期流程故障诊断中数据整流的集成

获取原文

摘要

The main purpose of this paper is to present a new framework for the integration of data rectification (DR) in incipient process fault diagnosis (IPFD). Significant amount of efforts have been made to investigate DR and IPDF separately during the last two decades. Integration of DR and IPFD has seldom been addressed in detail even though DR has been recognized as a key prerequisite for successful implementation of IPFD because there exist random errors and maybe exist gross errors in measured data fed into the on-line IPFD system and therefore can generate false alarms. . Gross errors can be divided into two classes: (1) measurement bias and (2) outliers. The bias refers to the situations in which the measurement values are consistently too high or too low. Outlier maybe considered as the abnormal behavior of the measurements, process peaks or unmeasured disturbance, for example. So the data with gross errors have great negative influence on IPFD. This paper is intending to improve the effectiveness of the existing IPFD systems by using integration of DR in it. In the proposed framework, there are five major components: process state identification (PSI) [1], Gross error detection and identification, sensor fault diagnosis SFD , dynamic data reconciliation (DDR)[2-3] and IPFD. Through PSI, the process is identified as steady state or dynamic one. Under the dynamic states, the gross error detection and identification is carried out. If the bias type of gross errors exist, then the zero drift or malfunction of the instruments may occur, which presents the base of the detection of sensor fault diagnosis. The Optegrity platform which is a new commercial package from Gensym corporation designed for abnormal situation management of chemical processes with built-in fault diagnosis capability of common equipments, such as sensors, heat exchangers, heaters, pumps and so on, is used here for SFD. If no sensor fault is identified, the data containing gross errors should be firstly treated properly and then reconciled through DDR to remove random errors. The reconciled data is then fed into the IPFD model for detecting process faults. The cause-effect IPFD model is also configured based on Optegrity. The benefit of using Optegrity for IPFD is that the reasoning is done automatically by the platform once the cause-effect model is established. Therefore, the development and implementation of IPFD is greatly eased. The proposed framework is demonstrated by an industrial case study. The simulation results indicate that the number of false alarms of IPFD is significantly reduced by using the framework proposed.
机译:本文的主要目的是为初始流程故障诊断(IPFD)中的数据整流(DR)集成的新框架。在过去的二十年中,已经提出了大量努力来调查博士和IPDF。 DR和IPFD的集成很少详细解决,即使DR已被认为是成功实施IPFD的关键先决条件,因为存在随机错误,并且可能存在于送入在线IPFD系统的测量数据中的粗略错误,因此可以生成误报。 。总误差可分为两类:(1)测量偏差和(2)异常值。偏差是指测量值始终如一的情况太高或太低。例如,异常值可能被认为是测量的异常行为,例如测量的异常行为,或者是未测量的扰动。因此,具有总误差的数据对IPFD具有很大的负面影响。本文打算通过使用DR中的整合来提高现有IPFD系统的有效性。在拟议的框架中,有五个主要组件:过程状态识别(PSI)[1],总错误检测和识别,传感器故障诊断SFD,动态数据协调(DDR)[2-3]和IPFD。通过PSI,该过程被识别为稳态或动态。在动态状态下,执行总错误检测和识别。如果存在偏置粗略误差,则可能发生仪器的零漂移或仪器故障,这提出了传感器故障诊断的检测的基础。来自Gensym Corporation的新型商业包,专为普通设备的内置故障诊断能力的Gensym Corporation提供的Gensym Corporation,例如传感器,换热器,加热器,泵等,用于SFD 。如果没有识别传感器故障,则应首先正确处理包含粗略误差的数据,然后通过DDR协调以清除随机错误。然后将协调数据馈入IPFD模型以检测过程故障。原因效果IPFD模型也基于Optegrity配置。使用Optegrity对IPFD的益处是,一旦建立原因效果模型,平台自动完成推理。因此,IPFD的发展和实施得到了极大的缓解。拟议的框架是由工业案例研究证明的。模拟结果表明,使用所提出的框架,IPFD的误报的数量显着降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号