【24h】

Nuclear Source Replacement – Promises and Pitfalls

机译:核源更换 - 承诺和陷阱

获取原文

摘要

In recent years there have been increasing market pressures and hints of regulatory changes that would require the total elimination of traditional nuclear well logging sources for downhole applications. There are a number of reasons why replacement of isotopic sources would be desirable, and a considerable effort has been expended discussing and researching the possibilities. The dialog has taken place at every level from internal research and development activity at individual companies and laboratories, through discussions among larger groups at technology forums and special interest group meetings, all the way to congressional hearings and formal Nuclear Regulatory Commission reports to the President of the United States. The issue is not just the replacement of the Americium- Beryllium neutron logging source, but of the Cesium- 137 source as well. Various service-company and operating-company groups have been wrestling with this problem for at least 30 years, and yet no acceptable replacement for the traditional Cesium gamma-gamma density measurement has been fielded. There are some services that produce a density curve using pulsed neutron generators, but none of these provides the accuracy and precision of the traditional sourced measurement. The gamma-gamma density measurement is the most trusted porosity indicator for reserves estimation around the world, and the lack of a viable sourceless alternative creates a problem for the industry. The fact that formation density and neutron porosity measurements are used for much more than just formation porosity complicates the issue considerably. This paper examines some of the potential benefits of using neutron generators and high energy photon sources in well logging. Pulsed neutron generators can be used for a number of measurements in addition to neutron porosity, and these additional data can be significant going forward. The potential for high- energy electronically controlled photon generators is truly great if we can produce measurements of quality comparable to the traditional Cs-sourced tools, and if we can get them to work in the downhole environment. We will also examine some of the difficulties involved in making all of this happen. There are significant hurdles that must be overcome to produce the necessary enabling technologies required to provide the level of reliability, accuracy, and precision that we have become accustomed to with the traditional sourced tools. We will discuss some of these issues and attempt to suggest a course forward.
机译:近年来,市场压力越来越大,监管变革的提示需要为井下应用的传统核井测井来源进行全面消除。有许多原因是为什么要更换同位素来源是可取的,并且已经花费了相当大的努力来讨论和研究可能性。该对话发生在各个级别的各个级别,在个人公司和实验室的内部研发活动,通过技术论坛和特殊利益小组会议的讨论,一直讨论国会听证会和正式的核监管委员会向主席报告美国。这个问题不仅仅是替代亚洲铍中子测井源,而且是Cesium-137源。各种服务公司和运营公司团体一直在摔跤至少30年来,然而,传统的伽马 - 伽马密度测量没有可接受的替代品已经存在。有一些服务可以使用脉冲中子发生器产生密度曲线,但这些都没有提供传统的源测量的准确性和精度。伽玛-Gamma密度测量是世界上储备估计最值得信赖的孔隙度指标,缺乏可行的源无源替代品为该行业产生了问题。形成密度和中子孔隙度测量的事实远远超过刚形成孔隙度使得大大复杂化问题。本文研究了使用中子发生器和高能光子源在井井料中使用中子发生器和高能光子源的一些潜在益处。除了中子孔隙度之外,脉冲中子发生器可以用于许多测量,并且这些附加数据可能是显着的。如果我们可以产生与传统CS-源工具相当的质量的测量,并且如果我们能够在井下环境中工作,那么高能量电子控制光子发生器的潜力真的很棒。我们还将研究一些涉及的困难,使所有这一切发生。有很大的障碍必须克服,以生产所需的能够提供所需的可靠性,准确性和精确度,以便我们已经习惯了传统的采购工具。我们将讨论一些问题并试图建议前进的课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号