首页> 外文会议>SPWLA annual logging symposium >Nuclear Source Replacement – Promises and Pitfalls
【24h】

Nuclear Source Replacement – Promises and Pitfalls

机译:核源替代–承诺和陷阱

获取原文

摘要

In recent years there have been increasing marketpressures and hints of regulatory changes that wouldrequire the total elimination of traditional nuclear welllogging sources for downhole applications. There are anumber of reasons why replacement of isotopic sourceswould be desirable, and a considerable effort has beenexpended discussing and researching the possibilities.The dialog has taken place at every level from internalresearch and development activity at individualcompanies and laboratories, through discussions amonglarger groups at technology forums and special interestgroup meetings, all the way to congressional hearingsand formal Nuclear Regulatory Commission reports tothe President of the United States.The issue is not just the replacement of the Americium-Beryllium neutron logging source, but of the Cesium-137 source as well. Various service-company andoperating-company groups have been wrestling withthis problem for at least 30 years, and yet no acceptablereplacement for the traditional Cesium gamma-gammadensity measurement has been fielded. There are someservices that produce a density curve using pulsedneutron generators, but none of these provides theaccuracy and precision of the traditional sourcedmeasurement. The gamma-gamma densitymeasurement is the most trusted porosity indicator forreserves estimation around the world, and the lack of aviable sourceless alternative creates a problem for theindustry. The fact that formation density and neutronporosity measurements are used for much more thanjust formation porosity complicates the issueconsiderably.This paper examines some of the potential benefits ofusing neutron generators and high energy photonsources in well logging. Pulsed neutron generators canbe used for a number of measurements in addition toneutron porosity, and these additional data can besignificant going forward. The potential for highenergyelectronically controlled photon generators istruly great if we can produce measurements of qualitycomparable to the traditional Cs-sourced tools, and ifwe can get them to work in the downhole environment.We will also examine some of the difficulties involvedin making all of this happen. There are significanthurdles that must be overcome to produce the necessaryenabling technologies required to provide the level ofreliability, accuracy, and precision that we have becomeaccustomed to with the traditional sourced tools. Wewill discuss some of these issues and attempt to suggesta course forward.
机译:近年来,市场不断增长 压力和暗示监管变化的暗示 要求彻底消除传统核井 井下应用的记录源。有一个 替代同位素来源的原因数量 是可取的,并且已经付出了相当大的努力 花了讨论和研究可能性。 对话发生在内部的各个层面 个人的研发活动 公司和实验室之间的讨论 在技​​术论坛上有更大的团体并有特殊兴趣 小组会议,一直到国会听证会 并向核监管委员会提交正式报告, 美国总统。 问题不只是替换Americium- 铍中子测井源,但铯- 也有137个来源。各种服务公司和 运营公司团体一直在与 这个问题至少持续了30年,但尚未被接受 替代传统铯铯γ 密度测量已经部署。有一些 使用脉冲生成密度曲线的服务 中子发生器,但这些都不能提供 传统货源的准确性和精确度 测量。伽玛-伽玛密度 测量是最受信任的孔隙度指标 世界范围内的储量估算,并且缺乏 可行的无源替代方案给 行业。地层密度和中子的事实 孔隙率测量的用途远不止于 只是地层孔隙度使问题复杂化 相当。 本文研究了一些潜在的好处 使用中子发生器和高能光子 测井资料。脉冲中子发生器可以 除了用于测量之外,还可以用于多种测量 中子孔隙度,这些附加数据可以是 重要的前进。高能量的潜力 电子控制光子发生器是 如果我们能够进行质量测量,那真是​​太好了 可与传统的Cs来源的工具相比,如果 我们可以让他们在井下环境中工作。 我们还将研究其中涉及的一些困难 使所有这些事情发生。有重大意义 必须克服的障碍以产生必要的 提供所需水平的使能技术 可靠性,准确性和准确性,我们已经成为 习惯于使用传统来源的工具。我们 将讨论其中的一些问题并尝试提出建议 一个前进的道路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号