首页> 外文会议>Canadian Veterinary Medical Association Convention >TRANSLATION OF LABORATORY RESEARCH INTO CLINICAL PRACTICE
【24h】

TRANSLATION OF LABORATORY RESEARCH INTO CLINICAL PRACTICE

机译:实验室研究临床实践的翻译

获取原文

摘要

There are very many interventions that have been shown to improve histological and/or functional outcome after SCI in experimental rodents. These findings have of course engendered a great deal of optimism that it might be possible to translate the experimental interventions into clinical therapies. However, there are many steps that must be made to fill this gap1, but the key data relate to four issues: 1. Will the interventions used successfully in rodents also promote recovery in 'higher' mammals(notably primates)? This question centres on the differences in anatomy between species, especially the dominance of corticospinal tract function over motor control in humans. 2. There is a size difference between experimental rodents and other species;the necessary 'scaling up' may vary in complexity depending on whether dealing with an administered drug or cell transplantation. 3. Experimental lesions are designed to be homogenous (see also point 4 below), whereas all clinical classification schemeswill inherently permit a degree of (often unknowable) heterogeneity. 4. There is a difference between defining a statistical difference to prove a principle and finding an effect that is medically relevant.
机译:有很多干预措施已经证明在实验啮齿动物中改善SCI后的组织学和/或功能结果。这些调查结果当然有很大的乐观情绪,即可能将实验干预转化为临床疗法。但是,必须有许多步骤填补这个差距,但关键数据与四个问题有关:1。啮齿动物中成功使用的干预措施也会促进在“更高”哺乳动物(特别是最灵长类的哺乳动物)中恢复?这个问题关于物种之间解剖学的差异,尤其是皮质脊髓函数在人类电机控制中的主导地位。 2.实验啮齿动物和其他物种之间存在尺寸差异;必要的“缩放”可能因无视是否处理药物或细胞移植而变化。 3.实验性病变被设计为均匀(参见下面的第4点),而所有临床分类方案都本身允许一定程度的(通常是不可知的)异质性。在定义统计差异之间有所不同,以证明一个原则并找到医学相关的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号