首页> 外文会议>International Astronautical Congress >Loosening Our Grip on Innovation: Encouraging Change in Military Space Technology Case Studies in Operationally Responsive Space Innovation
【24h】

Loosening Our Grip on Innovation: Encouraging Change in Military Space Technology Case Studies in Operationally Responsive Space Innovation

机译:松开我们对创新的掌握:鼓励军事空间技术案例研究的变化在运作敏感空间创新中

获取原文

摘要

Science and technology are pervasive in all aspects of economies, militaries, governments, and civilian life worldwide. The currents of national science and technology power flow beneath all other forms of national power. By themselves, science and technology do not grant power. They are merely tools through which other national power is expressed. The integrated circuit, one of the most startlingly large technology leaps of the 20th century, would not have had any impact on American national power at all had it not made its way onto projects such as Apollo. It is not enough merely to innovate: ease of adoption is key to leveraging science and technology to produce other forms of national power. Science and technology power is directly connected to how well the national entity in question (for the purposes of this paper, the military) adapts to change. This paper will examine several case studies in China and the United States which revolve around the use of technology in space to increase national security. Each case will include a broad and a narrow focus. The broad focus will concern the relationship of the military at large to innovation in science and technology, focusing on national security space, and how it is organized (disaggregated or centralized, tightly controlled or given free reign, generously funded or on a tight budget, etc). The narrow focus will evaluate the nation's approach to developing operationally responsive space. The results of this study show that governments and national entities which attempt to centralize and tightly control innovation fail to use science and technology to their fullest potential in the pursuit of national power (this is especially true for large, entrenched national militaries). The inherent tension between science and technology progress and the existing military status quo makes strict centralization and overbearing governance self-defeating activities.
机译:科学技术在全世界经济,军国民族,政府和民用生活的各个方面都是普遍存在的。所有其他形式的国家权力下的国家科技能源流动的电流。本身,科学和技术不批准权力。它们仅仅是其他国家权力所表达的工具。综合电路是20世纪最具惊人的大型技术跨度之一,不会对美国国家权力产生任何影响,因为它没有进入阿波罗等项目。仅仅是创新是不够的:易于采用是利用科学和技术生产其他形式的国家权力的关键。科学和技术权力直接与国家实体有关的方式(为本文的目的,军事)适应变革。本文将在中国和美国审查几个案例研究,这些研究围绕着在空间中使用技术来增加国家安全。每种情况都将包括广泛和狭窄的焦点。广泛的焦点将涉及军队对科学技术的创新的关系,重点关注国家安全空间,以及如何组织(分类或集中,紧密控制或提供免费统治,慷慨地资助或紧张预算,等等)。狭隘的焦点将评估国家发展操作响应空间的方法。这项研究的结果表明,政府和国家实体试图集中和紧密控制创新未能利用科学和技术在追求国家权力的最大潜力(这对于大型,根深蒂固的国家军队尤其如此)。科技进步与现有军事地位之间的固有张力使得严格的集中化和霸道的治理自我挫败活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号