【24h】

EMPHASIZING DECISION ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES IN THE DESIGN CURRICULUM

机译:强调设计课程中的决策分析技术

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Theoretically strong decision approaches such as utility theory are currently being researched for use in engineering design. Countless ad hoc decision tools have preceded this recent work, yet only a handful of these tools are used by industry or taught in universities. Reasons for the emergence of such a small number of acceptable decision tools are not known. In this paper, the opinions of undergraduate engineering students in an industry-sponsored senior design class and their sponsor mentors are studied to identify reasons why some decision tools are more popular than others. Two established decision tools were introduced to the class and used in the projects. A survey was used to gather student and sponsor opinions about the two tools and important aspects of decision tools. Results indicate a variety of factors influencing the students' preference of one decision tool, including simplicity, clarity of results, the ability to give more emphasis to certain criteria, and ease of communication of results to their sponsors. Other results from the study include information about strategies for integrating decision tools into a design process and the role of projects in promoting reflection and learning by students.
机译:目前正在研究实用工具理论等强大的决策方法,以便在工程设计中使用。无数的临时决策工具在这个最近的工作之前,但行业仅使用少数这些工具或在大学中教授。出现这种少数可接受的决策工具的出现的原因是不知道的。在本文中,研究了一个行业赞助的高级设计阶层的本科生工程学生和他们的赞助导师的意见,以确定一些决策工具比其他决策工具更受欢迎的原因。将两种既定的决策工具引入了该类并在项目中使用。调查用于收集学生并赞助关于决策工具的两个工具和重要方面的赞助意见。结果表明各种影响学生的一个决策工具的偏好,包括简单,结果清晰的因素,给予更多的重视一定的标准,缓解结果他们的赞助商的沟通能力。该研究的其他结果包括关于将决策工具集成到设计过程中的策略的信息以及项目在促进学生反思和学习方面的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号