【24h】

EMPHASIZING DECISION ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES IN THE DESIGN CURRICULUM

机译:设计课程中重视决策的技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Theoretically strong decision approaches such as utility theory are currently being researched for use in engineering design. Countless ad hoc decision tools have preceded this recent work, yet only a handful of these tools are used by industry or taught in universities. Reasons for the emergence of such a small number of acceptable decision tools are not known. In this paper, the opinions of undergraduate engineering students in an industry-sponsored senior design class and their sponsor mentors are studied to identify reasons why some decision tools are more popular than others. Two established decision tools were introduced to the class and used in the projects. A survey was used to gather student and sponsor opinions about the two tools and important aspects of decision tools. Results indicate a variety of factors influencing the students' preference of one decision tool, including simplicity, clarity of results, the ability to give more emphasis to certain criteria, and ease of communication of results to their sponsors. Other results from the study include information about strategies for integrating decision tools into a design process and the role of projects in promoting reflection and learning by students.
机译:理论上强大的决策方法(例如效用理论)目前正在研究中,以用于工程设计。在这项最新工作之前,已经使用了无数种临时决策工具,但其中只有少数工具可供行业使用或在大学中教授。出现如此少量可接受的决策工具的原因尚不清楚。在本文中,研究了工业赞助的高级设计班的工程学本科生及其赞助指导者的意见,以确定某些决策工具之所以受欢迎的原因。将两个已建立的决策工具引入班级并在项目中使用。一项调查用于收集学生和赞助者关于这两种工具以及决策工具重要方面的意见。结果表明,多种因素会影响学生对一种决策工具的偏爱,包括简单性,结果清晰性,对某些标准给予更多重视的能力以及结果向赞助商传达的容易程度。该研究的其他结果包括有关将决策工具整合到设计过程中的策略的信息,以及项目在促进学生反思和学习中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号